User talk:Sonez1113/Archive

This is an automated Miszabot I archive.

Reply to your comment on my talk page

Hi, what scenario are you referring to that you're saying I've posted? Which posting is that? Can you please provide an edit ID? BTW I'm flattered that you've taken inspiration from my user page!  :-) --Wykypydya (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Your "random comment from some person"

Hi Sonez1113, I was curious about what you had posted about a random comment that was erased and that you lost. You can get that comment from the page history. Try this link for instance. That guy was pretty vulgar and asinine. --Wykypydya (talk) 22:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Would you like Chewbacca's edit to your talk page removed from the public archives?--5 albert square (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake, not your talk page, your user page. If you check your user page history you will see it. Would you like it removed?--5 albert square (talk) 23:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done--5 albert square (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, for some reason it didn't work before, sorry! I've corrected it :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Multiple CSD template

You can use {{db-multiple}} for CSD tagging, rather than using two applicable templates. A full list of the appropriate tags can be found here: Template:Db-multiple. Mephistophelian (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Question

I belive this is under at least one CSD criterion but I don't know which. --Sonez1113 (talk) 00:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The page has been deleted by an administrator, User:Acroterion. He was of the opinion that it fell under criterion G2, a test page. Intelligentsium 01:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Well thanks, I guess it stumped the administrator too, because it seemed more like it was just random information

Another Question

I need help with the CSD of this, I can't decide, hoax or nocontent.

I do not think the page could be taged as CSD A3. If, for the sake of argument, the incredible facts alleged in the article were true, I think it might qualify as a stub, or be turned into a redirect to a main article if there was one.James500 (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Main article would be Prison, Likely a level three border named "Shaving controversy". I agree. Sorry, memory lapse!

If an article on Allison Gordon was created this could be merged in to it.

If, hypothetically, the article Allison Gordon Withdrawals was undeleted, it might, hypothetically, be possible to merge it into an article called Allison Gordon if, hypothetically, such an article were to be created in the mean time:

But, there is absolutely no possibility that the article Allison Gordon Withdrawals is going to be undeleted because it was a blatant hoax.James500 (talk) 18:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your message on my talk page. You do not need to apologise. It is perfectly alright.James500 (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

I am sorry but I do not understand your recent comment on my talk page.James500 (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Ash James

Please note that CSD criterion A7 does not apply to fictional characters. VQuakr (talk) 19:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sonez1113. You have new messages at VQuakr's talk page.
Message added 19:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

VQuakr (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Another question

I need some help with this, it doesn't seem right for an enclyclopedia. --Sonez1113 (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

See the article now. Another editor has just applied a PROD tag to the article, which is a form of deletion request. If nobody contests the deletion of the article, it will be deleted after seven days. You are right in that it is completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me about this. --Sonez1113 (talk) 02:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

19:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)