SongsforLulu

Welcome!

Hello, SongsforLulu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Another Believer _(Talk) 14:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Rufus Wainwright

--Another Believer _(Talk) 14:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello SongsforLulu, welcome to Wikipedia and welcome to WikiProject Rufus Wainwright.--Sylvia Anna (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you made a change to an article, If I Loved You: Gentlemen Prefer Broadway, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt

Hello, SongsforLulu! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#16:59:00, 29 June 2014 review of submission by SongsforLulu. Fiddle Faddle 17:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm Wintereu. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Draft:Jörn Weisbrodt without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Winter^eu (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Please leave the review history in place. It has a job to do during the review process, and helps future reviewers. Fiddle Faddle 18:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Jörn Weisbrodt (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 18:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! SongsforLulu, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Dear Wiki editors,

I've made the changes you requested re: the number of citations. There's now only one place with 3 citations and they're all necessary as removing one would mean the article content is not verifiable.

I've found the reference you requested (below), but since it refers to a category I don't know where to put it, so I'm pasting it here:

Brunette, Patrick “Lumière sur Jörn Fugues, Montreal, 22 March 2013. Retrieved on 30 June 2014. “J’imagine que c’est à ce moment que j’ai réalisé que j’étais gai.” (Translation: I guess it was then that I realised I was gay.) 

Thank you,

Lulu

Lulu 06:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SongsforLulu&action=edit&section=new#

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt

Hello, SongsforLulu! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#06:05:14, 30 June 2014 review of submission by SongsforLulu. Fiddle Faddle 08:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Tim,

on second thoughts, I've decided to remove the sexuality categories from the relevant section, so citing that reference won't be necessary after all. I hope you can give the article the go-ahead now. Thank you!

Lulu 10:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Jörn Weisbrodt was accepted

Jörn Weisbrodt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 11:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt

Hello, SongsforLulu! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Draft:Jörn_Weisbrodt. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#09:55:47, 3 July 2014 review of submission by SongsforLulu. Fiddle Faddle 11:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much Tim, I've sent you an email.

Lulu 15:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Jörn Weisbrodt

Both items in your email are done :) Fiddle Faddle 15:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

this diff shows you taht it was case sensitive. HARD to spot. The other item was to create a redirect page. Easy when you know how. Fiddle Faddle 15:49, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Tim, I've sent you another email, I look forward to your reply. Thank you!

Lulu 15:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Ignore the grading. Only the Wikiproject members care, and they are likely to send someone along at some point to look. If you like, remove the class totally and see what they give you. Honestly these are only for guidance. The readership never looks at talk pages. I chose Start because it;s very well on the way.. Have a look at WP:GA and see if you can work it up to that, or WP:DYK to see if a DYK can come from it. I doubt it will make a WP:FA but try! Treat these are frills and fripperies, honestly. Classes are a pain in the fundament in my view, for me, you and everyone else. They are always wrong. Fiddle Faddle 16:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, if you want to try for GA or FA, WP:GOCE may well help you. Nice folk. Fiddle Faddle 16:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Tim,

one final thing, I've tried to google Wiki(pedia) + Jorn Weisbrodt (with and without umlaut), and nothing comes up. Any idea why?

Thank you

Lulu 16:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Allow time to elapse. Google does not index 100% of the pages of any website, even Wikipedia. Always remember that Google is an advertising agency, not a search engine. If your boy is unlikely to generate advertising revenue it will delay indexing him (0.8 probability) Fiddle Faddle 23:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Permission emails etc

Hi Tim!

Mr Weisbrodt has arranged for two permission emails to be sent to Wikipedia (I've been sent a copy too) regarding use of the 2 photos. How do I check that these permission emails have been processed and the photos won't be deleted? If necessary I can forward you a a copy of the emails. I had put some sort of code with the photos to let Wikipedia know permission was being sought, should I just wait to hear from Wikipedia's permission department and will they delete the "permission sought" code?

Someone without an email address made some changes to the article, nothing major but I wanted to contact him and I don't know how to start a new message once I'm on his talk page. Sorry for being such a newby!!!! Thank you very much for your help Tim,

Lulu

This is complicated. The emails have to have been sent precisely as documented deep in WP:Copyrights. THis includes the files having, as I understand it, previously to have been uploaded, but I am not familiar with the system, and it takes a while. I am going to take the livberty of asking for expert help on your behalf.

Please will an editor familiar with the OTRS and procedures for the donation of copyright materials to Wikipedia read the recent segment above and advice Lulu how to proceed? This will involve a dialogue to determine with precision what has already been done. Fiddle Faddle 20:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Tim!

Lulu 20:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Help is always available, It is a matter of awaiting the correct expert, and, of course, knowing how to ask. I am expert in knowing what I do not know Fiddle Faddle 20:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Have the emails been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and did they contain enough information to identify the images, for example a link? Did they clarify that the images have been released under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify them for any purpose, including commercial purposes? Then they'll be acted upon soon, and notes with the OTRS ticket numbers that confirm the indicated license will be added to the file pages. If the emails are received and there's some problem, I'd expect Mr Weisbrodt to receive a reply from OTRS pointing out that problem. If he hasn't heard from OTRS in a couple of days, likely something went wrong with the sending itself.

Regarding the talk page, there's a "New section" tab at the top of every talk page; you can use that to start a new section for your message. As an alternative you could edit the entire talk page via the "Edit" tab, but new messages that aren't related to previous discussions should come in a section of their own to keep better order. Huon (talk) 20:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SongsforLulu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)