October 2012

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Otomedius Excellent, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. « ₣M₣ » 23:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages exist for a reason. « ₣M₣ » 23:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Skylanders: Swap Force, you may be blocked from editing. Crboyer (talk) 06:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  THAT DOES IT! It's time for one more final warning for you, because the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Skylanders: Swap Force, you may be blocked from editing without further notice FOREVER! Crboyer (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked forever from editing for abuse of editing privileges. You will never be able to make useful contributions anymore, because that block will never epxire. If you think we got good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Jeepday (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Case Closed: The Mirapolis Investigation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Olympic Hockey Nagano '98‎

edit

Jumping to different accounts will not help. Any further vandalism will result in this account getting blocked too. Bgwhite (talk) 05:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Hi Sotosbros. Are you the same person 173.55.156.155 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? --OskNe (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arch Rivals. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. you and OskNe are edit warring, if you continue, you may be blocked from editing. »Petiatil († talk ‡ contribs) 04:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Petiatil. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arch Rivals because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! »Petiatil († talk ‡ contribs) 05:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of infinite time for edit warring, as you did at Arch Rivals. You will never be able to make useful contributions anymore, because that block will never epxire. If you think we got good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

You have one SPI and four blocks to your name at this point. It's time for you to say goodbye to making useful contributions forever because you have been attacking other editors in your revert summaries. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


Dou you used IP 156.3.163.99 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? --OskNe (talk) 02:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply