User talk:SounderBruce/Sandbox/Retail
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Another Believer in topic Nordstrom Building: Minor improvements
| This is a subpage of SounderBruce's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Nordstrom Building: Minor improvements
edit@SounderBruce: Thanks for creating this draft. I hope you don't mind, I added a couple pics and subheadings. I hope you'll get around to converting this outline to prose and moving the draft to the main space. Keep up the great work! (And, of course, feel free to revert any of my edits.) ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thanks for the improvements. I tend to add pictures after prose to adjust formatting as I see fit, and subheadings afterwords as well. I'm still gathering newspaper clippings and references, though, so this draft isn't near finished. SounderBruce 03:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- I love watching the progress of this article's development, and look forward to its appearance in the main space and subsequent GA promotion (because, obvi, just look at it!) :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
SounderBruce, plans to move this into the main space? I noticed the deletion tag and removal. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- I do need to complete this one eventually, but I have had trouble trying to figure out a path forward with regard to the architectural details of the current store. Being rushed out of draftspace is really discouraging, though. SounderBruce 14:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Why don't you think it's ready? Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, it's a perfectly good article as it stands and you can still improve it once it's up on mainspace. SportingFlyer T·C 19:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Half of the article (mainly the architectural description) is still in bullet point form. Rushing things out is how mistakes are made. I'd also like a more complete entry for DYK and GAN. SounderBruce 22:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, Bruce! Do you still have plans to replace the Nordstrom Building redirect? I don't want to step on toes, but I'm tempted to at least create a stub for the building for now. I don't think this would prevent future DYK eligibility if you were to implement a major expansion. Just checking in, hope you're doing well! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: I'm still planning to finish out this draft. I've just been in need of some time, since I've been traveling recently and had very little time to devote to editing or writing. I believe DYK eligibility might be impacted if things aren't carried out properly, so I'd appreciate it if things are kept as is. SounderBruce 01:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Bruce, but making sure you saw the very recent creation of Nordstrom Downtown Seattle ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: I'm still planning to finish out this draft. I've just been in need of some time, since I've been traveling recently and had very little time to devote to editing or writing. I believe DYK eligibility might be impacted if things aren't carried out properly, so I'd appreciate it if things are kept as is. SounderBruce 01:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, Bruce! Do you still have plans to replace the Nordstrom Building redirect? I don't want to step on toes, but I'm tempted to at least create a stub for the building for now. I don't think this would prevent future DYK eligibility if you were to implement a major expansion. Just checking in, hope you're doing well! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Half of the article (mainly the architectural description) is still in bullet point form. Rushing things out is how mistakes are made. I'd also like a more complete entry for DYK and GAN. SounderBruce 22:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Why don't you think it's ready? Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, it's a perfectly good article as it stands and you can still improve it once it's up on mainspace. SportingFlyer T·C 19:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- I do need to complete this one eventually, but I have had trouble trying to figure out a path forward with regard to the architectural details of the current store. Being rushed out of draftspace is really discouraging, though. SounderBruce 14:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)