Web SourceContent

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2018

Delivered September 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

09:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Gabriel Firea

regarding [1], please look at what you're restoring before restoring - your revert restored blatant attacks and insults on Gabriel Firea Galobtter (pingó mió) 20:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Galobtter: Ok! I seen this message, I think it was unbelievable issue that I did it on Gabriela Firea. Need to suppress all WP:BLP strikes that were started. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

More info please

@Bbb23: Oh! :( You did blocking me. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 06:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Five emails

Thanks for sharing your five emails with me. I have had no interaction, nor undertaken any actions on this wiki with you. If you feel that you have been unjustly blocked, then you should pursue with the blocking email, through the process at Wikipedia:UTRS, or through the resolution process of WP:ArbCom. Emailing me will have no effect as I no longer am involved in the politics of enWP, I just potter around as an admin, primarily in the anti-spam space. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:43, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Web SourceContent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What happened to me. If there was CU block or have been suspected. Should be surprinsed, that Bbb23 demanded Tegel to lock me globally. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 09:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Web SourceContent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for this, I am likely, but not a exact sockpuppeter of Daciproteasa09. Now I have already emailed administrator who blocked me. I trying to make useful edits, now more times have past editing Ioan Buteanu and now Alexandru Dabija. I am sure that more misuses & violations won't happen anymore.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion and other inappropriate action, as 109.98.167.30 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 11:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

User plans to engage in WP:LTA; see Daciproteasa09 (talk · contribs). As such, I have revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I guess we're done here.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Web SourceContent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22799 was submitted on Sep 28, 2018 18:12:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Web SourceContent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22833 was submitted on Oct 03, 2018 08:02:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)