Space Infinite

This user wants to be your friend.

Speedy deletion nomination of GCIRS 7

Hello Space Infinite,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged GCIRS 7 for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lithopsian (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

This page GCIRS 7 is deleted now ! Space Infinite ( talk ⋅ Contributions ⋅ dgaf) 18:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC) !

That was me because my IP user was blocked from editing, so I wanted to sign me as a user I do not know how to create an account and after I know how to create one! V620 Cephei 12:05 2 Nov 2016 (UTC)

Request for clarification of puzzling editing

Can you explain the meaning of edits such as this? It produces a little box, divided into two, with strings of "less than" and "greater than" characters, two numbers, and links to two articles on other stars. I have no idea what that means, and I have no doubt that most readers of the encyclopaedia would likewise have no idea. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

That was me because my IP user was blocked from editing, so I wanted to sign me as a user I do not know how to create an account and after I know how to create one! V620 Cephei 11:57 2 Nov 2016 (UTC)

Shared account?

Can you explain the meaning of recent edits to this page by V620 Cephei? Does it mean that you allowed another editor to use your account? Also, I would still like an answer to the question I asked about 7 hours ago, and which I now see I had previously asked in June, whoever it was who made the relevant edits. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Space Infinite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but, User:Red Planet X (Hercolubus) and User:V620 Cephei are accounts for my brothers, User:Gotorn 999999 is account for my cousin and User:Ynoss is the account for my friend. Space Infinite (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

A major reason why you are blocked is because you and your relatives have multiple accounts. True, you technically aren't sockpuppeting, but when I see your edits and your relative's edits on page histories, you apparently like to treat Wikipedia as if it were a video game where you "fight with opinions". You have broken 4 (or 5) opinions by doing this: Edit warring, what Wikipedia is not, gaming the system, no original research, and sockpuppetry (maybe?) In order to avoid breaking policies and getting blocked, I suggest that all of you should share only one account and agree on a certain opinion (that does not break a policy). Therefore you cannot be falsely accused of sockpuppetry and are editing fairly by the policies. ----Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 23:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)