User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2013/November
This is an archive of past discussions about User:SpacemanSpiff. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Rewritten text for UIDAI
Please find below the rewritten text for the disputed copyvio. I await further examples of my vios.
According to Anupam Saraph, the UIDAI and its agencies bear no liability in law for criminal offences or privacy breaches effected under the scheme wherein the entire information, including biometric information, is processed by foreign corporates. As the UID scheme combines all a citizen's identifiers within a single number, UID misuse singularly exposes citizens to "unprecedented risk" when failure of a biometric verification results in individuals being disentitled from government benefits until the citizen is re-enrolled, a process controlled by politicians and bureaucrats.Notabede (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- This looks ok. I'm not here to provide you further examples, I've already told you that there's a lot more. Look through your contributions. —SpacemanSpiff 06:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- I cleaned up all my contribs. 8 days waiting for a clerk is outrageous for such a "High Importance" article. I'm waiting 24 hours then setting the page to a rewritten version. Please watch the article if you can.12:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notabede (talk • contribs)
Please look into the edits over the past few days. Can we restrict edits to autoconfirmed users.Notabede (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chirayu Amin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Rajesh Khanna image
I have uploaded File:RajeshKhanna.jpg, cropped version of image originall uploaded by you. But can't link it to Rajesh Khanna as lead section is too long for my browser. I think this is better image with his smile. Will you pls help me to link it to the article? Thanks. Abhi (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 October 2013
- Traffic report: 200 miles in 200 years
- In the media: Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia?
- News and notes: Sex and drug tourism—Wikivoyage's soft underbelly?
- Featured content: Wrestling with featured content
- Recent research: User influence on site policies: Wikipedia vs. Facebook vs. Youtube
- WikiProject report: Special: Lessons from the dead and dying
Unique Identification Authority of India
Spiff the users here a novice users and are new and don't have proper understanding of policies. Don't block them immediately instead try to reason with them to make them understand. Some of them might be involved with serious things including Sockpuppetry and Edit Warring. Sohambanerjee1998 15:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
BH copyvios
Hi! Your timing of taking break is perfect. The BH copyvio issue is boiling. There might start a larger discussion on the wholesale case. Will link it here whenever it starts. Request you to take out some time and join it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 November 2013
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: Five years of work leads to 63-article featured topic
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Accessibility
- Arbitration report: Ebionites 3 case closed
- Discussion report: Sockpuppet investigations, VisualEditor, Wikidata's birthday, and more
Precious
Flag of India
Thank you for quality articles about Indian topics, the Flag of India, women cricketers, Gods, Demons and Others and R. K. Narayan, for fighting vandalism, for speaking up for content and the personalities behind it, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
The Signpost: 13 November 2013
- Traffic report: Google Doodlebugs bust the block
- Featured content: 1244 Chinese handscroll leads nine-strong picture contingent
- WikiProject report: The world of soap operas
- Discussion report: Commas, Draft namespace proposal, education updates, and more
The Signpost: 20 November 2013
- From the editor: The Signpost needs your help
- Featured content: Rockin' the featured pictures
- WikiProject report: Score! American football on Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Ill Winds
- Arbitration report: WMF opens the door for non-admin arbitrators
Hey spiff!
Hi Spiff! can you please protect my user page? It has been subject to retaliation again? Although the user has been indeffed I don't want someone other to edit my page (other than autoconfirmed) again (ever). Plus if my page cannot be protected on vandalism grounds I want you to consider my request as that of one in userspace per WP:UPROT. Sohambanerjee1998 09:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Using different language query
Hi, I have been trying to edit some pages in Hindi Wikipedia but the supported citations or URL's are very less (of the topic in Hindi language searching) in number in comparison to the same topic in English searching. My question: is it fair to support English or other language URL's and citations for editing in Hindi Wikipedia, and if yes then up to what extent? Please elaborate. Thanking for your co-operation. Work2win (talk) 14:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- @Work2win: Hi! SpacemanSpiff is away on a break since long. To answer your question, you may use as many non-Hindi sources as are required to make the content verifiable. The core thing is that content should be verifiable even if not all users can verify it. We do allow references which require special access permissions on web or offline books also. Same with non-Hindi sources. In case someone challenges the content, you can always ask some uninvolved editor to get the content verified. And being English, there would be plenty editors to help out in verification. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)