Spamhog
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~
Dori 22:51, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)
What's with the current text on User:Spamhog? ugen64 21:17, Dec 9, 2003 (UTC)
- Given that it appears to be a perfectly ordinary User: page, I'd guess Spamhog just forgot to log in. Salsa Shark 21:26, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Erik Grant Lea
editThank you!!
Eric Grant Lea 2.
editThe Author of his biography, Norvald Tveitt, has written a very absorbing book. But it raises perhaps more quesions than it answers. The auhor has thrown all his notes away, so it is impossible to go back and check details. It is also a weakness that the author based his manuscript on face to face interviews with Lea. This raises the question about the objectivity.
Erik Tveterås has written an article about him in in the book "Bergen citizens in thousand years" and has based its content on extensive research in the publich archives. It more or less confirms the biography.
His career lasted from 1914 to 1925 when he had to depart to Gjølanger which he did know nothing about. The top of his wealth was in 1917. His ship owner companies (6) was raided by the management company Bjørnstad & Brækhus and Lea was sacked as a president.This was, as far as I can see later on in 1917. But the 1. of january he had started an insurance company, Lea's Assuranceselskap A/S. It had offices in Kristiania (Oslo) and in several foreign countries. In relatively quick sequence he started the companies Jupiter and National an started a bank, The Lea Bank with a capital stock of 1 mill N.Kr.
He worked day and night and in 1918 he "met the wall". He had been completely worn out, and he began to concern himself with religious questions. A consortium of business men from Bergen offered him a fair sum for all his operations. He accepted and was still a very wealthy man. But he gradually became restless. All he really had needed was a long, good holliday. He then bought back his operations about half a year later. But he did a lousy job studying the companys books and did not consult a lawyer. He was shown the operations fund capital, 350 000 N.kr in cash in the wault of Bergen Kreditbank.. But the owners had been more than dishonest. The next day the wault was empty. It also eventually became clear the the companies had been involved in hazardious speculations and the financial situation was very weak - in fact on the edge of the abyss.
Lea became the sole manager in a depesrate attempt to get his bank back standing on its feet again. In 1921 the bank went bankrupt.
In 1920 an attempt to establish a new shipping company was a failure due to the falling freight market. In 1922 the Bergen Kreditbank sold his residence for half the sum of its estimated value (450 000) - 250 000. The bank needed the money quickly, as they later claimed.
The only propery he had left in 1925 was the property i Gjølanger, a relatively big area. But the wood was meagre, so it was a tremendous labour to make even a little profit. The residence had not been maintained for years. It was cold and very difficult to keep warm. His indian wife had to sleep with an umbrella because the roof leaked everywhere. The first christmas eve he had to row his boat fishing on the fjord in hope of getting something for dinner.
He never made a fortune in Gjølanger, and an attempt to get into the shipping business again i 1936 failed. But compared to his fellow citizens, he did comapartively well. They were all small time farmers in a sparsely populated area without roads. The first road came in the sixties.
His wife never settled, and never learned to speak Norwegian. She has been described as a Butterfly stuck on an ice floe. She was very beautiful and exotic and made no friends among the local population.
She had from time to time visitors from her family in England (Scotland?). Her sister visited her just before the outbrak of the warWWII and was stuck in Gjølanger for five long years. She survived her sister by about 10 years. Mrs. Lea died i 1960. When her sister died, her ashes was brought to the chuchyard i Dale. So Lea, his wife and his sister in law rest side by side, covered with big, identical slabs.
His later wife Hildur, is still alive. When I inteviewed her i 2002 she had passed 90 mand was agile, sharp end clear. But I could not speak freely with, her because som younger couple, relatives of her who interfered all the time. I had an odd feeling they were there to keep her for answering certain question. The only touchy theme I could think of, was the diastrous fire in 1950.
Hildur and Lea had no children. She was half his age when they got married.
Lea and his first wife Hilda had a child, a girl named Sunniva. She is now in her sventies and living in Arna, in the outskirts south of Bergen. It is still more than obvious she has ben an extremely beautiful woman. In the age of seven she was sent to a catholic school in Oslo.
None of his businesses has survived him to my knowledge. But the land area is now full of mature trees ready to be cut to timber. His quay has been substituted by a modern concrete stucture. But Late in the nineties there still were some remains of the old one. One should keep in mind he did everything with his own hands. He knew nothing about construction and had to learn everything by trying and failing. It was not until after the fire, his fellow citizens had some compassion with him, and helped him to rebuild what the flames had consumed.
Until then he was regarded as an unwelcome intruder who did everything his own way.
His athletic achivement were extreme, nearly self tormenting. Even in his younger days he performed feats which were quite unusual in his circles. He did this to keep himself fit and sharp - good for his busieness.
A final indication of his nature: His wife was dependent of her walk every sunday. So, one of the first thing he did in the roadless Gjølanger was to make her a road where she could have her sunday walks. And he grew a hedge on both sides to protect her from the cold winds.
I am familiar with the land he bought and left to the city of Bergen. But I have no idea of their borders. But I will try to find out more - unfortunately I live in the city of Ålesund 400 km north of Bergen, so I will se what I can do next time I go there.
Norway was not a part of the WWI, but the sympathy was on the British side. Some profited on the war in a way that was not to be very proud of. But Lea lead a fairly decent business, which led to a lot of envy. He sold his busines fresh and sound and the bought it back on the edge of bankrupcy. He was smart, but also unsuspecting and naive.
I do not know of links between torpedoes an cargo ships. But I know also Lea made profit on insurance of torpedoed ships. I do not think this was very much at his taste.
Assuranse - Assurance. The later was the corrct spelling around the WWI. The FIRST is the correct spelling today.
From where do you have you your Norwegian knowledge?
Leas -Lea's
editUntil recently the correct genitive spelling was Lea's. Now the correct form is Leas. I also feel the hairs rise on my neck when seeing it. Assuranseselskap - Assuranceselskab the latter is a danish form in the Norwegian of his time.
Address
editMy address is
fihellan@online.no
Frode Inge Helland
Vasstrandvegen 61
6011 Ålesund
Norge
Your edit to List of generations
editGiven your previous history of good edits, I'll assume good faith and not put any uw- template here. I just suggest you consider the edit again: The two references to WW I were in relation to before WW II had occurred. Mark Hurd (talk) 00:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I reviewed it again myself and the first reference was to WW II. I've changed it back. Mark Hurd (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of generations
edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of generations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of generations (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
RD-107 article "correction".
editPlease read the whole first paragraph before making changes. Yes, the RD-107 can't be sibling to itself. The RD-108, which appears in the following paragraph and is included in the article multiple time, is. Yes, it was simple typo. But mistyping a single number is quite more probably mistake than doing a complicated grammatical construct to call something sibling of itself. Baldusi (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Spamhog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit Hello, Spamhog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Spamhog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Spamhog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Illuminism" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Illuminism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 28#Illuminism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
I noticed that you changed the target of this redirect way back in 2010, and thought you might like to know that I've nominated it for discussion at WP:RFD. If you think this nom is in error, I'm happy to discuss! AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)