Speckle11b
Welcome!
edit
|
Vonny Sweetland
edit
Hello, Speckle11b. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Vonny Sweetland, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 18:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vonny Sweetland, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The content you are adding is sourced to opinion articles, blogs, or the actual article subject, which are not reliable sources, especially not for the promotional content you are adding. You are also adding content that is cited to sources that do not support the content you are adding, which is entirely inappropriate. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vonny Sweetland, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Vonny Sweetland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Vonny Sweetland, you may be blocked from editing. I reduced your block in the hopes that you would engage in good-faith discussions at the article's talk page. Removing other users' talk comments is not good-faith discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Speckle11b reported by User:Wallyfromdilbert (Result: ). Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 20:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see any evidence of other editors acting in bad faith. I strongly suggest you self-revert this edit to avoid being blocked for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also, it is a bad idea to remove your own comments from a talk page if others have replied to them. It distorts the flow of the conversation. —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppetry by blocked account
edit Hello, Speckle11b, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 24.114.222.94 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Please declare your conflict of interest; if you are a paid editor, you must declare that
edit As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Vonny Sweetland, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Speckle11b, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Speckle11b|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. In particular, you uploaded a professional head shot and claimed it as your own work. That tells me you have some kind of connection to Sweetland, whether it be as a campaign staffer, a contractor, a volunteer, or a friend or associate. Please declare what that relationship is. In the absence of a statement by you, expect other editors to assume that you are beign paid to edit his article. —C.Fred (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Speckle11b, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.