Speed8ump
I was recently blocked by administrator Dmcdevit and the reason given was 'Primetime'. I suspect this is a reference to this banned user? I have tried contacting Dmcdevit in what appear to be the accepted ways (email, talk page) as described on this page but I have recieved no response. My next step will be to attempt to use the unblock template, but I thought I would try here one more time.
Unblock request
edit{{unblock|Dmcdevit is doing edits but I can't get him to respond to any communication. I'm not yet certain why I have been blocked.}}
- I left a note for you on Dmvdevit's talk page. He wouldn't notice your messages on your talk page. ---J.S (T/C) 18:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've already left a note under "Why am I blocked?". Perhaps he will notice yours. Thanks in either case. --Speed8ump from 207.235.66.3 19:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've disabled the unblock template to stop this page appearing in Category:Requests for unblock. Feel fee to re-add it if the blocking arbitrator does not respond to your query within a day or so. Sandstein 20:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- will do, I'll give it until EOB Monday. --Speed8ump from 65.190.129.36 23:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- The block was based on IP correlation between you and a banned user. Since you deny it, I will, though, assume good faith and unblock you. Sorry for any inconvenience. Dmcdevit·t 23:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- will do, I'll give it until EOB Monday. --Speed8ump from 65.190.129.36 23:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've disabled the unblock template to stop this page appearing in Category:Requests for unblock. Feel fee to re-add it if the blocking arbitrator does not respond to your query within a day or so. Sandstein 20:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've already left a note under "Why am I blocked?". Perhaps he will notice yours. Thanks in either case. --Speed8ump from 207.235.66.3 19:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Speed8ump. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)