User talk:Spidey665/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Make more mainspace edits

According to here, the majority of your edits were made on your user and user talk pages...how about making mainspace edits (articles) ;) --Bryce Wilson | talk 03:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to. A lot of my edits were like that on Annoying Orange Wiki as well. Spidey665 13:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

After B.wilson's edit encouraging you to edit in the mainspace more, what's the first thing you do? Make 7 edits to user talk pages. Please don't just say "I'll try to"...actually "try to." Also, please stop bringing up your other wikis....focus on Wikipedia only while you're here. only (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay. I am not super-active here, nor am I a Wikipediholic. --Spidey665 16:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Final warning

If you cannot focus on Wikipedia, and continue to focus on user talk page edits and discussing Wikia issues on here, you will be blocked. You are not doing anything productive. Please focus on main space edits. only (talk) 01:56, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I thought "Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users." This block seems not for disruption and the tone of your message seems like it is a proposed punishment. Although I would prefer if Spidey sent these sorts of issues to my email. Can you consider if blocks like that would be in compliance to Wikipedia:BLOCK#Common_rationales_for_blocks? --Bryce Wilson | talk 00:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

No, this would be preventative. Wikipedia is a project, an encyclopedia. It is disruptive to be treating it like your personal hangout. Blocks for treating Wikipedia like MySpace have been enforced and upheld for many years now. If he continues in the pattern he's shown (and I note, yet again, that his most recent edit deals with informing you about another Wikia...), then he can be blocked. only (talk) 01:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. Spidey, I'm really sorry to say, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not Facebook or MySpace. Keep on going with your anti vandal work here, Trusilver and I appreciate it. If you want to discuss anything about Wikia please email me and don't bring it up here. --Bryce Wilson | talk 01:12, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Please also don't mess with randomtime's talk page. --Bryce Wilson | talk 01:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

You appear to have the blues...

I apologise in advance for the pun, but I did really drop in to say that he blue background is about as out of place on a user page as fast Funk hi-hat paraddidles would be on a slow blues number. It cancels out the blue links and makes them - and pretty much everything else unreadable. I also endorse user:only's comments. A touch of maturity please ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spidey665 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry, but I did not know that. I will just read the policy. Besides the Wikia thing is over with. I will spend more time on the articles.

Decline reason:

You lost me at "sorry but I did not know that". If by that you mena you did not know about the policy you were repeatedly warned about, then you may not be sufficiently competent to edit in this environment. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If the "Wikia thing is over with," how come you've been talking about "the plan" for it only 45 minutes ago? only (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

The plan failed. I have no use in that site anymore. Spidey665 21:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for one week

Almost two days ago I warned you about focusing on editing the encyclopedia instead of socialization, especially your focus on talking about other Wikias on other's talk pages. Since then, you have made 4 edits to encyclopedia related issues, but this is only a small number of the edits you've made since then. Your last 5 edits have all been socialization on B.Wilson's page about the other Wikia. Since it is clear that you are not being productive here, I have blocked you for a week. I highly suggest you spend some time trying to figure out what you plan to edit on Wikipedia, and how you can productively contribute. only (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I can edit some Queen pages. --Spidey665 21:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Jet50

Jet50 had a blog for saying I'm a bad user. Should I block him? If so, how long should I block him? Luigirules33

B.wilson for admin! Spidey665 19:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about this, but next time I leave you a message, I have to do it on Wikia or I will get blocked. Sorry. Luigirules33

Block conditions

I'm just pointing out that if you continue to ignore the warnings and use Wikipedia for ||WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK|for socialising]], your block might be extended indefinitely, together with your rights to edit your talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)