Splatg
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. You may also want to check out Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Finally, here are some open tasks:
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Other links for reference: Wikipedia:Wikiquette, image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Merge
Hope to see you around the Wiki! Remember to be Bold! with your edits, and if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!Seems you joined some time back, I just wanted to welcome you. <>Who?¿? 7 July 2005 11:28 (UTC)
WOAH there cowboy
editDid you start any discussions on talk pages about your grand plan to divide the article Marathon (computer game) into FIVE articles? This is a big step and one that you need to gain consensus for BEFORE doing it. I for one am opposed -- there simply isn't enough encyclopedic material. Please direct me to the appropriate discussion demonstrating such consensus or I will revert your changes. Argyrios 18:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Note that there are many duplicate paragraphs among the five articles. This is a pretty clear sign to me that the articles did not need to be split. When I do revert the changes pending your acknowledgement of this objection, I will be sure to start a topic on the talk page about your proposal and add the following template to the sections for each game
{{splitsection}}
- I'm sorry but we have a way of doing things here, and we operate by consensus. You SHOULD be bold in editing, but not in making sweeping and controvertial changes. Argyrios 19:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah I'm sorry about that, got a bit carried away. I'll revert all that stuff back and then we can do this the proper way.
- Cool. I would suggest leaving the individual articles for now, but replacing the "main article" thing under each one with the {{splitsection}} template. Another possibility, which I would be more in favor of, would be to divide the article based on category rather than game, something along the lines of how Myth (computer game) has one page for the whole series of games, a separate page Story of Myth (computer game) for the story. The story is really the main difference between the games anyway... weapons, characters, etc, are pretty constant.
- I don't want to seem like an asshole about this, and if everyone else agrees with your proposal I will happily concede defeat. Argyrios 22:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Newcastle Wikipedia Meetup
editA few Newcastle Wikipedians are going to get together for dinner some time in June. We'd love you to come! Please click here for more details. --One Salient Oversight 13:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
TINA2011
edit
Wikimedia is at TINA. Come along any time today to participate in an interactive visual workshop about Wikis. Bring along your photographs and stories to participate in creation and editing of Wikipedia content. We're planning a meetup for dinner this evening, so signup and watchlist Wikipedia:Meetup/Newcastle/TINA2011. --John Vandenberg (chat) 21:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)