User talk:Sportsfan77777/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sportsfan77777. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
How to list tournament finals in Performance timelines
Thanks for the additions to the Coco Vandeweghe Singles performance timeline. I have two questions. (I have examined, for only a few players, the information you labeled "Titles-Finals", so I don't know whether there is a generally-accepted practice for this kind of information.) (1) Since the information you included in the "Titles-Finals" row is WTA-level information, would it be appropriate to label it as such? (I think I have seen Performance timelines where this kind of information includes both WTA-level and ITF-level play; if ITF information of this type is included here in the Performance timelines of some players, I thing that labels would be very useful.) (2) How about listing this information as Wins-Losses rather than as Titles-Finals; I find the latter to be confusing, since most of the other information in a Performance timeline is expressed as "W-L"? In summary, what about changing the label of this row to be "WTA Finals" and changing the far-right 3-column span of the row from "2-3" to "2/3 2-1 67%"? One complication with the "WTA Finals" label could be that a reader might be confused about whether or not information about Grand Slam finals is included, so maybe "WTA & GS Finals" would be a better idea.) Free2brag (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sportsfan77777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)