Springs24
Springs24, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Springs24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC) |
August 2020
editHello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2020 United States Senate election in Maine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please refrain from edit-warring, which is defined as repeatedly adding or removing information. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Please read the policy before making further edits.--User:Namiba 18:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Please cut it out Generaluser11 (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Generaluser11: No, you need to cut out brazenly violating an Rfc. The threshold is an average of 5% in polling which Savage doesn’t satisfy. You clearly have a conflict of interest or personal bias here. Springs24 (talk) 23:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Salvio 20:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Springs24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was a simple content dispute, and the page was left in the new version that’s clearly in violation of a prior RFC on infobox criteria. At the very least, the page should br protected and returned to its original form. User:Generaluser11 reverted as many times as me.
Decline reason:
You're a sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Now you're being imprecise; here's how that edit war went:
- As you can see, Generaluser11 has not reverted as many times as you. Furthermore, thinking you are right does not excuse edit warring and, in any case, I have only issued a partial block, so that you can still discuss the isse on the talk page. Salvio 09:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)