Welcome!

edit

Hello, Squgaltutti4427, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thomas.W talk 12:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 12:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for re-adding material that had been removed for being unsourced or improperly sourced trivia. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a local school bulletin board. Thomas.W talk 13:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have no been reverted three times, by three different editors, so stop. Thomas.W talk 13:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Squgaltutti4427 reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: ). Thank you. Thomas.W talk 14:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring at Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Squgaltutti4427 reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for adding unsourced trivia, again. Thomas.W talk 14:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute. Final warning for repeated addition of unsourced trivia. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a school bulletin board. Thomas.W talk 14:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply