Sr.ganador

Welcome!

Hello, Sr.ganador, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bitcoin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ===== >50% attack =====

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Writing about local bitcoins

If you want to include a mention of localbitcoins.com, you'll need to cite it following WP:RS. Basically, include a citation from a major news outlet or one that's not bitcoin-specific. Please don't contribute uncited information to the page or info that's cited with hard-to-interpret sources such as bitcoincharts.com. Fleetham (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Sr.ganador (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, in fact charts are more informative and are up-to-date every time, unlike media - you can still find old news claiming that MtGox (bankrupted some months ago) is the leader in bitcoins exchange. But I agree that they are hard to read for non-traders, when I will edit next time, will find more easy to understand proof.