User talk:Staberinde/Archive 3

Ship camouflage

Thanks for the German image which does help to balance the Allied emphasis in the article. What is really needed now is a good reference or two to German and other Axis ship camouflage sources. If you know of any, that would be extremely helpful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Nah sorry, don't have any, my knowledge about this topic is limited to what I have seen on photos :) --Staberinde (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, but you never know, you may come across a museum booklet or something one day. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for EUFOR RCA

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Deportations of the Ingrian Finns

Hello! Your submission of Deportations of the Ingrian Finns at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Deportations of the Ingrian Finns

Gatoclass (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Huh?

Re this edit. Why the dab? The link was pointing to the right article. Am I missing something? Renata (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

How it can be pointing to right article then paragraph talks about crusade against Sambians in 1254/55, while Battle of Rudau is about battle in 1370?--Staberinde (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Ants Kurvits

Sounds like Latvian 'Kurvītis'? --Zemgalietis (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

No idea :) Maybe Latvian language version could be found from some list of Order of Lāčplēsis recipients, but other than that I can't offer any good advice on this.--Staberinde (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Sia (musician)#Requested move 4

I invite you to an ongoing move request; you were involved in one of previous discussions. --George Ho (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military of Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Covert United States foreign regime change actions". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 26 February 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Covert United States foreign regime change actions, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Eleven Days War

Hallo, I was looking for candidates for List of wars named for their duration and saw this dab page, but I can't find any mention of "Eleven days war" in Operation Linebacker II. If you've got a source for that name, please add it to the article. Otherwise the dab page needs to be deleted as there's no justification for that entry on it. The dab page should only have one blue link per entry anyway - I'll do a quick tidy up. Thanks. PamD 17:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, if I do quick google or google books search for "eleven day war" you should get lots of Linebacker II results. I will throw something to that page.--Staberinde (talk) 12:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Estonian Free Party

Hello! Your submission of Estonian Free Party at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Alex2006 (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Estonian Free Party

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Jean Baptiste Holzmayer

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

	The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
	Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dzungar genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dzungar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikicology arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 22, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

The message was sent using the case's MassMessage list. Unless you are a party, you may remove your name from the list to stop receiving notifications regarding the case.

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I think you meant [1]; please revert if I'm mistaken. NE Ent 16:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that's what I meant, thanks.--Staberinde (talk) 16:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Hello, I'm CWH. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ch (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

If you have actual arguments about my edit, then please present them. Otherwise, frankly I can do without patronizing vandalism templates.--Staberinde (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
2. DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
3. DHeyward (talk · contribs) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
4. For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
5. Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
6. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Estonia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SvenEst (talk • contribs) 23:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Staberinde. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Just a notice about Estonia

Hi,

I saw that there's an edit war going on at Estonia's article. Just wanted to let you know that JonSonberg (when the report was opened his username was JaanMatti and it got changed while waiting for a decision) was already blocked for edit-warring not long ago. Should he be reported again? Because it's clear that he learned nothing from his last ban. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Just want to let you know that I took his abusive editing to WP:AN3. If you want, please give your input there. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up!

Dear Staberinde,

Thanks for the warning! Although, you could improve your grammar. Alright, I'll cease operations (albeit reluctantly) against the others (even though I'm right about the infobox issue/controversy).

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Staberinde. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Timeline

Hi, would be great to get your opinion on this thread:

[Timeline Table]

SørenKierkegaard (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nordic countries

Hi, respectfully asking for your opinion in the "Estonia" section of the Nordic countries talk page. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ülo Nugis

Hello! Your submission of Ülo Nugis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  JGHowes  ^talk 22:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Ülo Nugis

On 25 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ülo Nugis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ülo Nugis was the first Estonian politician to publicly call for Estonia to join NATO, even while Soviet troops were still present in the Baltic nation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ülo Nugis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ülo Nugis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Oeselians & Norsemen

Hi! You seem to know a lot about the Estonian history. There is an open discussion on the pages: Oeselians and Norsemen. There are editors claiming Oeselians were not Finnic or not speaking a Finnic language, and other editors claiming they were Finnic. On the Norsemen page, there are some editors claiming there was a Norse settlement on Saaremaa, while other editors are saying there's no proof for that. Would be grateful for your input! Thanks! Blomsterhagens (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Staberinde. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)