User talk:Stacy.johnson515/Argument Article

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Subzero10 in topic Peer Review Sidney Parks

Review by Tyra Saxton

edit

You did a good job of having a well thought out quote from a reliable source in every paragraph. Your arguments are already convincing and valid. Adding the quotes is just icing on the cake. Both of your JSTOR articles have a lot of good information. I also decided to use the 'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Wikipedia's infrastructure and the gender gap, article. I am excited to see what information you decide to pull from the second JSTOR article you have.

Peer Review Sidney Parks

edit

Subzero10 This is a great start to your article, by the introduction I know what your going to talk about. Your sources you used were very reliable to back up your information that you were talking about in your paper. You used proper punctuation and grammar throughout your paper. I like how you used percentages and statistics to set out your information in your article. I liked how you talked about the women being separated in there own group or category about being novelist. This is a great paper so far. Subzero10 (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Subzero10Reply


Review By Dominae' DuWhite

edit

Your essay looks great so far already! I like how much of the good information you included. I also enjoyed the statistics you included to support your arguments even more because it further proves your point. Your grammar is great throughout your entire paper. I enjoyed the information you wrote about the gender gap and how women are still being separated from males. I am eager to see what your final paper looks like in the end.