Stagalj
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
Blocked
edit--Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
editYou appear to be a sockpuppet of long-banned Velebit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu), as you are editing the same materials as he and his sockpuppets did, restored materials added to Talk:Neo-Nazism by a number of checkuser-IDed Velebit sockpuppets after another editor removed them, and are behaving in a similar abusive manner.
Based on this conclusion, I have imposed an indefinite block on this account as well. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Stagalj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not see any evidence against me given here. The very sad thing is that this administrator abuses his admin rights blatantly. I undid some talk pages removal - due to apparent fact that user Rjecina removed far more than comments of the suspected puppet
Decline reason:
This account may very well be a sock puppet of a banned user, and even if that is untrue, there has been edit warring and disruptive editing sufficient to justify a block of several days or a week. I am not going to unblock at this time; however, I have asked a checkuser to review this situation[1] and may consider unblocking if additional information comes to light. — Jehochman Talk 14:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.