Welcome!

edit

Hello, Starmaker1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2016 Rugby League Trans-Tasman Test Match, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mattlore (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2016 Rugby League Trans-Tasman Test Match

edit
 

The article 2016 Rugby League Trans-Tasman Test Match has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

one off test match that is not notable on its own, merge with season articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2017 NRL Nines

edit
 

The article 2017 NRL Nines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, fiction/TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cricket All-Stars Series 2016

edit
 

The article Cricket All-Stars Series 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, possibly fiction

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to William Shakespeare has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Mattlore. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to William Shakespeare have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattlore (talk) 05:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to 2016 All Stars match

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! William2001(talk) 05:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cameron Smith, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattlore (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of World All Stars team

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on World All Stars team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Datbubblegumdoe[talkcontribs] 00:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hildegard of Bingen— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Francis of Assisi with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 14:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

This account has been blocked indefinitely due to continued vandalism and hoaxes coming from it. Sergecross73 msg me 14:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starmaker1234. Thank you. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 14:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Footy Classified (NRL)

edit
 

The article Footy Classified (NRL) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"coming in 2017" for a TV show is far too crystal ball to warrant its own article...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply