Statesman1

September 2009

Your recent addition to United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. nableezy - 15:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Instead of continually reverting, could you please make your case on the talk page? nableezy - 16:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Statesman1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit-warring

Hello Statesman1. I noticed the edit-war at Six-Day War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This is a topic which falls within the scope of a past arbitration case, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles and so is one where edit-warring is typically dealt with more harshly; there is a formal notification message that explains this and I will leave such a message below. If it happens that you feel the need to revert again at Six-Day War, please consider pursuing dispute resolution instead. CIreland (talk) 11:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

The notification template I mentioned follows:

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Edit-warring noticeboard report concerning you

Hi there,

Since you've reverted without discussing on the talkpage, I've filed a report on the edit-warring noticeboard concerning the vetoed resolution and prepared, but not performed, attacks. Respectfully, --Dailycare (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Six-day war

Hi there,

I'd like to draw your attention to this talkpage comment, as I'd like to work on the Background section and it seems that you feel strongly about the content you've repeatedly added into it, however as I explained in my edit-warring noticeboard report concerning you, I disagree as to the relevance of this content, especially as compared to some other content you've tried to remove. So to move things along, I'd appreciate if you replied to the talkpage comment. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)