Staugingersdisciple

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Barner-Kowollik (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Barner-Kowollik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christopher Barner-Kowollik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Staugingersdisciple! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Christopher Barner-Kowollik has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christopher Barner-Kowollik. Thanks! StarryGrandma (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Your addition to Draft:Christopher Barner-Kowollik has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

The Research section was a copy of his bio at http://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/about-journals/polymer-chemistry/editorial-board-members/. Besides the copying problem it is very promotional writing and not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Barner-Kowollik has been accepted

Christopher Barner-Kowollik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

StarryGrandma (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Photo appears to be a copyright violation

The photo you added as your "own work" has metadata with a copyright statement by the photographer. It appears to have been taken at the same photo session as this image at Queensland University and the image used on his faculty webpage. Not violating copyright is very important to Wikipedia. The copyright may have been transferred to the university and they may be willing to donate the image to Wikipedia. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I will ask the university to donate it directly to Wikipedia.Staugingersdisciple (talk) 09:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Staugingersdisciple. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Christopher Barner-Kowollik, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Flat Out (talk) 05:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback! I am as well as the person described in my article a chemist myself. I believe that scientists who make actual contributions to the progress of mankind deserve to be noted on wikipedia. I am very sorry If my original style of writing was too promotive, but I am very passionate about science and inspired by the research of this Person. This is my first article and I tried to change the wording accordingly. In my future articles I will try my best to keep up to it from the beginning. Thank you again! Staugingersdisciple (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Photochemical action plots has been accepted

Photochemical action plots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)