AfC notification: Draft:Martha Teiko Teye has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martha Teiko Teye. Thanks! Zanimum (talk) 04:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martha Teiko Teye (May 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, StayTrue3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Martha Teiko Teye

edit
 

Hello, StayTrue3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martha Teiko Teye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Amo-Boateng (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MarcGarver (talk) 14:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply