Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zach Fortier

edit

Thanks for your time on the IRC channel, I hope you are not too discouraged. I neglected to mention that overall you have put a lot of good effort into this article. Unfortunately from what I can tell, the police career doesn't establish anything notable, but would be kept if he is notable otherwise. So that leaves the Arthur bit, and there is no significant coverage of his authoring work (WP:AUTHOR), and I cannot find a way to support the Amazon status, currently the best selling book is still ranked #1,946,111, which seems a far cry from the claim in the article. If it was true that it was a best seller and there is a reliable source then the article might be something worth keeping around. Unfortunately wikipedia is not simply a collection of all good cops, or authors. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also all of the references for the author bit don't meet the reliable source criteria. The first one doesn't exist, and the other two are blogs, which are not reliable. That leaves the author section completely unreferences. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zach Fortier concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zach Fortier, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zach Fortier

edit
 

Hello Steeleshark. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Zach Fortier".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zach Fortier}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply