Steezymac23
July 2020
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Rachel Maddow Show. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Finngall talk 01:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
They are not vandalism they are fact. Rachel Maddow rose to prominence peddling the Russian Spying a conspiracy. And was in fact ruled by a court to not be a News program but opinion journalism. Steezymac23 (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Stop allowing false information to be published on your pages. She is in fact a Conspiracy Theorist just like Alex Jones. There is no difference so why is her show labeled news when it was found by a court of law to be Opinion journalism? Conspiracy theories are opinions and she peddled one for about 2 years on her show and still does. Steezymac23 (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
March 2022
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)- Blocked for your attempts to harass Muboshgu--and let's add that of course you logged in to continue your harangue. I can make this a WP:NOTHERE block too, if you like, since you are clearly not here to improve our beautiful project. Drmies (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes you are weak willed humans that can't defend your opinions that are inserted into Wikipedia pages as facts. Wikimedia has been emailed and names are being listed to them with screenshots of everything being disputed and all information that is relevant. All of you need to be removed for inserting opinion into a supposed Encyclopedia. Steezymac23 (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry one administrator can't handle the truth about themselves. They are either lying or completely misinformed on the definition of words they are attempting to use. Steezymac23 (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your Beautiful Project HAHAHAHA. So actively inserting your opinions as fact is a Beautiful Project to push your own agendas? Cause that's what Moboshgu was doing. They said Impeachment means that the accusations were facts, which spits in the face of what Impeachment means. Impeachment literally means Formal Allegations in the form of charges also known as an indictment. So everyone who has indictments brought against them are proven to be guilty? No an indictment is a formal charge or accusation not a Conviction. You guys are supposed to know what basic words mean and you don't yet you guys are the ultimate say here. Most people don't trust Wikipedia already.... excuse me for trying to restore trust in your "Beautiful Project" by putting in a factual narrative and not an ideologically driven narrative that is basically a form of Propaganda Steezymac23 (talk) 02:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Even the guy who created this project thinks what you guys are doing is disgusting. "Your Beautiful Project" HAHA. No it was his and people like you destroyed it. Congratulations Steezymac23 (talk) 02:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well, it's certainly not your project anymore, and here's the thing: every time you do a Google search, the work of some of the collaborators on this project will be right there on your screen. And you could have been part of that group of editors. Instead, you had to go and cheat, and insult people who work here like this is the internet. You want to know my agenda? Here: WP:5P. Drmies (talk) 00:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
edit