User talk:StefenTower/Archive 35

Archive 30 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35

Tech News: 2024-19

MediaWiki message delivery 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:150th Kentucky Derby logo.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:150th Kentucky Derby logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-20

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

Reverting my edit

You reverted my edit on Botswana having 20 graduates. I forgot to add a source, sorry. It’s been added, and I realized it was 22, not 20. 48JCL (talkcontribs) 12:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-22

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-23

MediaWiki message delivery 22:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully on the Clark Memorial Bridge....

About 5 of us have added citations stating the truck was at fault. There is video. A few cited it that police cited the driver, who had habitual offenses, cut the trucker off leading to it crashing. Is there a reason these keep being reverted? Is there a personal connection? It is in multiple articles https://www.wlky.com/article/clark-memorial-bridge-semi-crash-louisville-charges-arrest/60295903. The way this article is written, it makes it sound like the trucker was at fault. I am all for being accurate and I have no idea why I care about this issue but when I see the amount of reverts when there is ample evidence - I wonder how neutral it is. I mean this with respect, I promise. I just cannot phantom the amount of reverts and have not seen this on many other articles. All I care about is accuracy and this article is not written in a neutral manner for information that has come out. Thank you. Marc3702 (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

"About 5 of us" looks like 2 in the edit history of the subject article. Anyway, as always, the Wikipedia prefers that content is backed up with a reliable source. I reverted twice before because such was not provided at the time the additions were made. We're not allowed to synthesize or jump to conclusions; the sources have to come to any conclusions we include in the copy. I will review recent sources to see where this stands. As a long-time Wikipedian, I care about accuracy and neutrality. Given other vehicles were involved, that should be mentioned in some way, but only as far as the sources go. Of course, I'm not the only one who can make additions to the article. Whoever does just needs to ensure the added copy is backed up. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
  Done I rewrote it to cover the immediate cause of the incident (pickup crashing into semi) and that the bridge had to be closed for repairs. I don't see any necessity of adjudicating legal responsibility or going into past of the pickup driver, because this isn't a news article but rather an encyclopedia article about the bridge. I think the matter now has been given its WP:DUE weight. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 05:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)