Stella2707

AfC notification: Draft:Planon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Planon. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @Kvng, I really appreciate your help! I've now listed the top three sources on the talk page of Draft:Planon.

If you have more tips on how to improve this draft, I'd be happy to hear them!

Thanks, Stella2707 (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Be aware that the AfC process is, I can't think of a polite way to say this, a gauntlet. Also our inclusion criteria for articles on companies is particularly tight. Don't forget to hit the Submit button on your draft when you're ready for the real fun. ~Kvng (talk) 13:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @Kvng! I've given it a try and submitted the draft now. It would be great if instead of deleting it right away, someone would be willing to help me rewrite it first - but we'll see! Thanks for all your help; despite it being a bit intimidating, it's also fun here. Let's hope it stays like this! ;) Stella2707 (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

The benefit of using AfC and Draft: space is that it won't be deleted. The consequence of having a not-to-snuff article here is a decline and then you have an opportunity to make requested improvements and resubmit. The downside is that collaboration in Draft: space is rare so it's not likely someone will help you write the article here. ~Kvng (talk) 13:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planon (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Sohom Datta,

Thanks for your review, even though the result is somewhat disappointing ofc. I will go over the text and sources again to try to replace it with better ones.

I have read through the manuals beforehand and tried to choose the sources based on the Wiki criteria. Could you maybe help me by choosing 1-2 examples of sources that might meet the Wiki criteria and 1-2 that do not? That way, I know which direction to go.

I’d also appreciate your advice as an experienced user: How would you proceed? I can see how to find better sources or turn the text down to a stub and let it get filled up by other users. (In that case, where could I find help from interested users? I am actually surprised that the topic of FM software does not have more 'fans' that are covering this topic on Wikipedia.)

Thanks a whole lot! Stella2707 (talk) 19:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Pare it down to the bare bones, and include atleast 3 extremely reliable sources, (given the topic area, academic sources or in-depth coverage in industry magazines might be your best bet). Sohom (talk) 02:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Stella2707! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)