StephanCom

talk to me

Coober Pedy, South Australia

I've reverted your edit since it's unsourced and seemed to be more of an unsure edit were you added that it was in or near the town. If you're going to readd it please source it with a verifiable and reliable source. Bidgee (talk) 03:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm watching the movie right now. It's IN Coober Pedy. And around it. stephan.com (talk) 03:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't matter if you're watching the movie as it's original research. Find a source to support it. Bidgee (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

added five sources, you pick. Some of them support the other movies on the page - none of which had references either. stephan.com (talk) 03:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Nearly half of the 4+ hour, three part version I'm watching right now takes place in (at first) or near Coober Pedy - the last third is intentionally a bit vague as to exactly how far from the town it is. But it's a crucial point, mentioned all through the film, and some opals from there are important in several scenes. stephan.com (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Sources are not great. 3 of them failed policies of Wikipedia, one may fail Self-published sources policy and the other is ok. It doesn't matter if you're watching the movie and see what you think it a location but it's OR and you could be wrong. Look at Australia which was only filmed in Darwin for 2 weeks for about 15 seconds of the movie with the rest shot at other locations in Australia. Bidgee (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, go watch the movie - it's a great film - and see if you question for a second where it was shot. I realize that's not good enough for Wikipedia - which is frustrating - but the fact is well documented. stephan.com (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Funktion-One

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Funktion-One requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Lisa Bufano

Again, many thanks for the helpful photos. Everyone who knew Lisa is wrecked on some level by her unexpected death (and the artistic community in Boise is just gutted), so the Wikipedia article is serving as a memorial. She's for the ages now. kencf0618 (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User Github

Template:User Github, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Github and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Github during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, StephanCom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, StephanCom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StephanCom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beyond the Magic Door

The article Beyond the Magic Door has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced since 2007; merge to The Magic Door?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)