Stephenbeckerle

Proposed deletion of Beckerle Lumber

Hello, Stephenbeckerle

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Beckerle Lumber, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello SunDawn,

I tried to answer your message this morning but I think I didn't send the message because I wasn't logged in?

I will try again forgive me if you already got my message from earlier.

Basically I wanted to thank you for pointing out the issues with the page and let you know I am going to add some changes that hopefully will make the page worthy.

Let me know what you think.

Stephen Beckerle user:Stephenbeckerle Stephenbeckerle (talk) 18:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I have updated the page with more content & references.

Let me know if this is good enough for now to not be deleted from wikipedia.

The intention here is, this is just the beginning of this page.

I invite & expect others to contribute to this new page.

Thanks for your help. Stephenbeckerle (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Beckerle Lumber for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beckerle Lumber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beckerle Lumber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

ok very good.

I will try to find some time to improve article.

Any recommendations? Stephenbeckerle (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Stephenbeckerle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Beckerle Lumber ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Stephenbeckerle,

It was an unwise move to create sockpuppet accounts because your article was nominated for deletion. There were better ways to handle this and just because there was a deletion discussion doesn't mean that the article you created was inevitably going to be deleted. Now, you are blocked and any future accounts you create will be blocked. Please read over the block notice (above) and if you wish to be unblocked, review Guide to Appealing Blocks before filing an unblock request.

If you just create additional accounts while you are blocked or edit while logged out as an IP editor, you will make the likelihood of getting unblocked very remote. So, don't panic, read over the information at the links provided, and play by the rules. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #64529

is closed. Noting user admits to asking on FaceBook that others join the AfD. Annd, I see that an unregistered editor took him up on that. @Stephenbeckerle:, it is doubtful that a random person thus recruited would understand WP:N well enough to discuss notability at AfD. Coördinating edits off-Wiki in this manner is a form of WP:sockpuppetry -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I posted on a community FB news page to inform the local community about the delete article discussion and to JOIN in the discussion if they had an interest. I did NOT say how to weigh in.

I just asked them to join in if they had interest.

This is a community web page that is used to post local news. I was posting news to JOIN in the discussion NOT "recruiting".

That anyone responded

means that there is interest in the community by whoever responded. Again I state these users are doing this on their own NOT because of me.

I ONLY informed them of the wikipedia discussion. I did NOT realize this was against the rules. I am surprised this is a reason to block me from wikipedia?

I would think the more people that weigh in on the discussion the better?

Is it against the rules? Stephenbeckerle (talk) 11:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I should also make sure it is clear and for the record -

I did NOT "coordinate edits" with anyone. Stephenbeckerle (talk) 12:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Also for the record: I have only had and only ever used ONE account (Stephenbeckerle) for my entire 13 years on wikipedia. Stephenbeckerle (talk) 13:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)