Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Ju66l3r. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GBT/C 20:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, I was the one to place a note regarding an article you began. I removed the note when my request for deletion of your article was removed as a part of redirecting the page to the already established article on the subject you were beginning to write about. The note I left (which began your user talk page from scratch) was not relevant given that the article became a redirect and so I removed it and noted why in the edit summary. That is not vandalism and you were incorrect to claim it as such on my talk page so I have removed that too. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. ju66l3r (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Paramount Parks

edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Epson291 (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good one

edit

Really, good joke --Bolt (Talk) 13:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not a sockpuppet

edit

I'm not a sockpuppet of User: Elladog. I've never even heard of that user.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stick Figures On Crack (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I made a mistake with Paramount Parks

Decline reason:

That article is not the only reason you are blocked, you need to address the other issues of your block such as abusing multiple accounts. — Tiptoety talk 16:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stick Figures On Crack (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

Looks like the same user to me, too. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why do I look like a sockpuppet of User: Elladog?

Why do you ask? Are you looking for advice on how to make your next sockpuppet less obvious? Please, just wait until you're more grown up to edit Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I won't wait until I'm grown up, and I'll kill you!

The fact that you have demonstrated that you are unwilling or unable to stop making death threats is one reason that you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia any more. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply