User talk:Stmrlbs/sandbox

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Stmrlbs in topic SPI 03 example
edit
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.


section a

edit

blah blah blah

section b

edit

blah blah blah

aaabbbcccddd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stmrlbs (talkcontribs) 02:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

section c

edit

blah blah blah

section d

edit

go.. section b --strmlbs|talk 02:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

bummer. this is why search results pointing to hatted discussions are hard to find.

SPI 01 example

edit

this is how the font sizes are styled in wikipedia. why.. I don't know, but it seems to be the standard

Awaiting Clerk approval

edit

Suspected Puppet

edit
Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC)
edit
Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor
edit

SPI 02 example

edit

does Report date have to be a superior section? why not equal with other sections? can there be more report dates per suspected puppet, or more subcategories on the same level. so far, I have not found any. alternative, with Report date being on even level with rest of SPI report.

Awaiting Clerk approval

edit

Suspected Puppet

edit
Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC)
edit
Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor =
edit

--stmrlbs|talk 20:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


SPI 03 example

edit

Awaiting Clerk approval

edit

Suspected Puppet

edit
Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC)
edit
Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor
edit

--stmrlbs|talk 20:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply