Stoprev
A tag has been placed on Trevor Brady, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User:Stoprev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornixtalk 04:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with User:Stoprev. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's [[Talk:User:Stoprev|talk page]]. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 04:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Trevor Brady
edit A tag has been placed on Trevor Brady, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dethme0w (talk) 04:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Trevor Brady. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Dethme0w (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
edit Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Trevor Brady, you will be blocked from editing. —BoL 04:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Trevor Brady. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 04:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with User:Stoprev. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Corvus cornixtalk 04:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Stoprev, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornixtalk 04:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Corvus, I'm not sure one can really vandalise one's own user page. We should be focusing on this user's re-creation of mainspace spam articles. Dethme0w (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- As long as a user is doing a draft on its userpage that's not blatant advertising, it's fine. However, if he does continue, [ shots ]. —BoL 04:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, and have declined the speedy. I see it as general user info. I have, however, removed a spam link. - Philippe | Talk 04:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- As long as a user is doing a draft on its userpage that's not blatant advertising, it's fine. However, if he does continue, [ shots ]. —BoL 04:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
To Stoprev: Please read all our guidelines, especially WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:N. If you don't, and you continue to set off our black kettles, *whoo!*, although I won't be doing the *whoo!*. —BoL 04:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Too late, I already blocked him for recreation of inappropriate pages. 24 hours. - Philippe | Talk 04:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- And I know that. That's for when he's unblocked in 24 hours. —BoL 04:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Once it was pointed out that it's a copyvio, I deleted it. Inappropriate. - Philippe | Talk 04:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- And I know that. That's for when he's unblocked in 24 hours. —BoL 04:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Too late, I already blocked him for recreation of inappropriate pages. 24 hours. - Philippe | Talk 04:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trevor Brady, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.trevorbrady.com/art/html/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Trevor Brady
edit A tag has been placed on Trevor Brady, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dethme0w (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Trevor Brady, you will be blocked from editing. Dethme0w (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trevor Brady, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.trevorbrady.com/art/html/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Trevor Brady, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STOP, you got blocked last time. If you don't want to get blocked again, for longer than 24 hours, I suggest you stop and read the links I gave you. If you continue to do so, I will report you to an active admin. Don't bother circumventing this bs by creating a new account, either, as I'm a very good sockhunter, and I will know who you are, although I am retired from sockhunting. Either way, stop! —BoL 02:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Trevor Brady
edit A tag has been placed on Trevor Brady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BoL 02:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)