StraferOfTruths

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did in your edit summary.Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dust Filter 01:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

You are clearly a moron for thinking that a perfectly coherant and factual article is nonsense.

Thanks for confirming my initial impression that you're merely a troll. Now go away and get your rocks off elsewhere. --Calton | Talk 01:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Writing a factual article that is NPOV is trolling?

No, it isn't. Unfortunately for you, that's not what you actually did. See, arguments only work when they actually apply to a situation.

Don't let the doorknob hit your ass on the way out, y'hear? And have a good day. --Calton | Talk 01:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on an article you created, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how {{{1}}} is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:{{{1}}}]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Eggy49er 01:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

What's wrong? Let's see: self-referential, and not a whisper of a hint of breath of a notion of notability, real-world impact, notice, or reliable sources. And you know this, so stop with the trolling. Oh, and the passive-aggressive question trick really doesn't work very well. Buh-bye! --Calton | Talk 01:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Calton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dust Filter 01:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Dust Filter, you will be blocked from editing. Dust Filter 01:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Dust Filter, you will be blocked from editing. Dust Filter 01:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. --Calton | Talk 01:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Calton | Talk 01:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Calton | Talk 01:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Calton may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 01:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Likewise for User:Evb-wiki. Realkyhick 01:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Evb-wiki, you will be blocked from editing. --Evb-wiki 01:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

blocked

Hi there. Despite all the warnings above, you continued to make edits that are either an inexplicable series of terrible accidents or intentional vandalism on other editors' user and user talk pages.

This type of harrassing behavior is not tolerated on Wikipedia. You're blocked for the next 31 hours. Please review WP:VAND, WP:HARASS, and edit in a more friendly manner when your block expires.

We welcome contributors of any background and interests who want to make positive contributions. If that's your intent here, try and treat this as a learning experience, and you will be fine in the future. If your intent is to bother people, please don't bother to come back. We will block you again, if need be permanently, if your goal is to just annoy people.

Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Georgewilliamherbert 01:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok...

Whatever you're doing to make those edits, stop. All you're doing is dropping junk on people's pages. See what you did here to your own? Georgewilliamherbert 01:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I like the way this "junk" looks.