User talk:Strike Eagle/Archives/2

Re: Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Jammu and Kashmir freedom movement

Renominated here (as a courtesy, I am informing everyone who has not yet commented in the new discussion, but was part of the original discussion). 198.102.153.2 (talk) 19:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hello Strike Eagle. You recently applied for a Wikimedia IRC cloak, but it looks like you forgot to register your nickname first. Could you please log on to IRC and do:

/msg NickServ REGISTER <password> <email>

where <password> is a password of your choice and <email> is your e-mail address? After you do that, please follow the instructions that are e-mailed to you to confirm your e-mail address. When you're done with that, I just need you to confirm your cloak request:

/msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request

After you finish all of that, I'd be happy to get you a cloak. :-) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --Filip (§) 17:01, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

"Re: User talk:Tattoodwaitress/Archive1#Some stroopwafels for you!"

Hello, Strike Eagle. You have new messages at Tattoodwaitress's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. . . and again. Tattoodwaitress (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Delhi/GA1

I can handle this all myself but I m getting pretty less time for wiki (actually my addiction is causing me a headache if I do too much of wiki). So in free time can you please have a look at it and try to address minor concerns if possible. Thanks :) →TSU ^tp* 07:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

Thank you. Mrt3366 ^(Talk?) 04:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

• Special report: Springer's misappropriation of Wikimedia content "the tip of the iceberg"

• News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI

• WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit

• Featured content: The cake is a pi

• Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases

• Technology report: To support or not to support IPv6, and why knowing when this report was last updated might be getting easier

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

You deserve this

An ICBM for you!

	The Intercontinental Barnstar
	For participating in the discussion about Agni-V and VI range projection image...:) Anir1uph (talk) 16:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

wow and thanks a lot!.......btw....did you and mrt reach any consensus about Agni-Range projection image..I mean any new image proposals..etc.....if no then, we may proceed for the second stage-SVG conversion.What say? ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 14:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, consensus was reached, and the new image is on use on many pages. Tho i do feel that the font used on the image should be more professional, and not a sans font :P (i havnt told anyone about this, just my own opinion). Yes we should proceed with it. Anir1uph (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Can you give me the link to the new image? ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Agni Missile Range comparison.png

so..its the same we discussed...good.. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 15:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:JCAla. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Mar4d (talk) 04:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi SE! Hope that you take out some time and do wiki from your busy life lately! I saw your barnstar in which few editors were accused of pushing POV by you. Well SE, that wasn't the right thing. It only adds petrol in the flame. On one hand while I discourage Mar4d for templating you, I'd also like to advise you to avoid typing names of specific editors. "Comment on contributions not on the editor". Your busy life can lay influence on editing on wiki in the start as it gets too much mixed up so take care while editing. I know that you'll find a way and please don't repeat typing names in a negative way. Thanks buddy! →TSU ^tp* 07:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

• Just a note, SE. It is ok to completely blank others' comments from your talk page but you should not amend or refactor them. See WP:TPO for further reference on editing comments on talkpages. Also, it is completely normal to cite wikipolicies to other editors. That is not preaching as you call it. Well there's a template for what I just wrote and there's equal support for templating the regulars but writing it out to you for the good faith. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Amend and refactor?..I didn't amend anything by Mar4d.I just striked it off as I felt it was not necessary.Mentioning names somewhere else...I couldn't realize it was attacking other users(not the talk page one)......anyway....TSU removed the names from both JCAla's talk and Mar4d's talk.Maybe it's normal to cite wikipolices to relatively new users...however..I know the policy...he should have removed the names himself from both the barnstars and left a note(not template) in my talk.That would have been better...rather than using TW to Templar my page. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 14:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

TSU being uninvolved did a good faith act, if Mar4d removed it, I'm not sure things would have gone the same way... it would have been incited more. For policies, I disagree... when I cite policies, the purpose is to back up my argument, not to preach - though it is right that even relatively old users often might not be aware of all the policies (and they are not required to be). TW is just easy and quick and says what's just needed to be conveyed, though it is better leaving just a message when things could get flamed up - templating should also be taken in equal good faith. And about the strike, that counts in refactoring in my opinion... striking means he has redacted the comment.. I don't see that he did. Just trying to cool things down here. Thanks for the {{tb}}.. you're not on my watchlist. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes....he should have removed it...and then should have messaged(not templar) me.That would have been completely different.You may cite policies for backing up your argument but you must also remember that the other user might already be aware of those and might tackle them.yes..I striked the comment as I felt it was not worth templating me.And about the tb thing...yes..I know that.. ;) ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 15:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, from STiki !

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Strike Eagle! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBigXray 16:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

thanks a lot....... ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 14:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Since last few days, your work in anti-vandal area is remarkable! I m impressed a lot. Thanks for that and I hope that you continue this. You deserve this... →TSU tp* 16:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot TSU..that was quite cheerful to do more. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle ^Sorties 16:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Reliable Sources/Noticeboard

Your WP:RS/N question has been rejected as too vague. Please supply the following:

• Citations of specific sources, at the article level
• Per source, supply the Encyclopaedia article that it is intended to be used in, and the specific claims that it will be used to support.

Thank you, Fifelfoo (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Pakistan

And who are you to dictate terms on Pakistani article? are you an admin to revert edits? no. Nevertheless, I do agree consesus should be reached but do NOT revert my edits. Pk-user (talk) 14:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

For your kind information...any editor can revert an edit provided they give a valid reason.I did give a valid reason.Don't add the information again until consensus is reached.User:TopGun reverted your edits once.Then, you revert his edit.If you really intend to wait for consensus, you should have not reverted the edit.And as I already mentioned in Talk:Pakistan and your talk page, the figures given for 2012 are estimates.2012 GDP results are not out for any country including Pakistan.So, a consensus should be reached whether to include the expected future GDP or not.Until then, please refrain from adding the figures else I would have to take the matter to an administrator.Thanks! ϮheⱾtrikeΣagle ^™ 14:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

The articles on wikipedia clearly mention GDP estimate NOT actual data. I have mentioned this on talk page. Let's discuss it there. Pk-user (talk) 14:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

And please take the matter to an admin should you wish. I think my case is pretty solid. Pk-user (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

No...I said I would take the matter to an admin if you continue to revert...you aren't so...why will I?.. ϮheⱾtrikeΣagle ^™ 15:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		Civility Award
		For your patient civility and kindness when discussing content and policy issues with other editors. JCAla (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot JCA..however....I'm no match to the civility and politeness you display...keep it up...:) ϮheⱾtrikeΣagle ^™ 13:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

• Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?

• News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

• WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia

• Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"

• Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)