Blocked

edit

Comments such as these [1] are completely unacceptable. henriktalk 07:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Another administrator may overturn this block at-will without contacting me if they feel that this block is incorrect:

  1. See contribs, user has been repeatedly incivil on the talkpage of the article.
  2. Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/St_Christopher#Single-purpose_accounts, this account appears to be a disruptive SPA, and seems to only exist for advocacy regarding St. Christopher.
  3. Don't bother saying I'm a crony of JzG. Actually, we don't get along very well, but your edits appear to be blatantly violating the spirit of the remedies given in the arbcom case.

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/St_Christopher#Community_bans applies to this block.

Please read the policies that JzG mentioned before requesting an unblock. Please note that repeated unblock requests may result in this talkpage being locked. Thanks. ~Kylu (u|t) 08:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply