Sugarpeas

June 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to The Woodlands College Park High School ‎ appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

I see that you are trying to create an article for her at Draft:Toni Lane Casserly. Please don't add her to the alumni list until after the article is approved (assuming it is) and you provide a reliable source for her attendance (the claim in your draft is not sourced). And please do not source anything to user-generated sites. I removed one reference to a wiki.. Meters (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, I'll see what I can find for an official attendance citation. Unfortunately it seems the digital record keeping from High School was (and probably still is) pretty poor. Maybe I will be able to get a citation if the page is published. I didn't know her, her family, and I don't have contact with the school anymore so I'm limited to what I can find online. However I had been watching the cryptocurrency and blockchain news and she seemed to be commonly featured and well regarded in several mainstream news sources. I figure that might qualify for the Wiki notability standards, hopefully that's been adequately documented. Sugarpeas (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2020 (CT)

The attendance source does not need to be from the school , and in fact it is better if it is not. Any reliable published source is fine. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find one. Good luck. Meters (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Sugarpeas, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sugarpeas! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sugarpeas! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Neglected Geology Pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toni Lane Casserly (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spicy were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toni Lane Casserly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Toni Lane Casserly, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Toni Lane Casserly

Hello, Sugarpeas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Toni Lane Casserly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Toni Lane Casserly

Hello, Sugarpeas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toni Lane Casserly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --Ferien (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)