User talk:Sugarpuff888/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sugarpuff888. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of Billboard Adult Contemporary chart achievements by decade. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mainstream Top 40 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mainstream Top 40 was changed by Sugarpuff888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942964 on 2017-12-07T15:18:55+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart achievements for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart achievements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart achievements until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CheetaWolf (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)