SunnyCatDeliciousBread

Welcome!

Hello, SunnyCatDeliciousBread, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Erik Sommer. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Possibly (talk) 23:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for these raources. I will go through everything you listed here in order to make my contributions better. Is there anything in the article on erik sommer or any other articles which should have been done differently to be done differently? SunnyCatDeliciousBread (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

It would seem from your edits (example) that you are already quite familiar with how to edit Wikiepdia at quite a high level. Be sure to disclose and WP:COI you may have. Possibly (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Will do SunnyCatDeliciousBread (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Stepan Ryabchenko, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please be careful, too, in selecting sources. The issuu.com site, for example, is essentially self-published, and may not qualify as a reliable source for a reference in Wikipedia. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 14:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much Uncle Bubba. I will make sure to keep my opinions and any invalid sources out of any future edits I do. SunnyCatDeliciousBread (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SunnyCatDeliciousBread! Your additions to Kenny Scharf have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)