February 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Airstrike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tropical cyclone, you may be blocked from editing. Deli nk (talk) 13:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Coriolis force.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Coriolis force was changed by Sunny X5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933868 on 2016-02-05T13:32:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • You may only be unblocked if you can civilly communicate that you are willing to follow Wikipedia policies. "Please reply or I will create other accounts" is unacceptable, as is the abuse of violent images in your unblock request. —C.Fred (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  —C.Fred (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply