Suoerh2

Fortunately

Yes, the word is POV everywhere it is used. Encyclopedias don't make value judgments, even ones that (in your view) are blatantly obvious and/or uncontested. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

AWB is not a bot, and I do not use it as such. In fact, your recommendation that I check every edit and do it by hand is a great idea, and I already do this. I did skip several instances of "it should be noted", in many cases based on the concerns you raise. AWB is mainly a helper application to (in this case) find all the articles which use the language in question, and gives me an edit window to fix the grammar/language as needed. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Dionyseus

Dionyseus is currently under ArbCom review [here]. Your comments, I'm sure, would prove quite helpful. Danny Pi 12:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Trivia

A lot of your edits seem devoted to removing {{toomuchtrivia}} tags. I'm sure your intentions are good, but please have a look at Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles and the Wikipedia:Trivia#Practical steps suggestion essay. Yes, it is true that fans like to read fun facts about the TV shows and movies they enjoy. However, Wikipedia articles are not the place to display those facts indiscriminately, in list form.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 23:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Anonymous user reverting File sharing in Canada

The anonymous user has struck again and it seems he's got issues (see my talk page.) I would have reverted him again but I don't think revert wars are good. Could you take a look at File sharing in Canada and, if you feel like it, revert it to any version you prefer? I will go with whatever version you prefer.

Thanks. Loisel 05:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

PROD

A request on DRV should do it. That said, I can tell you that if it comes back, I'll take it to AfD, and I really doubt it will survive - the article is an unsourced fan theory that is necessarily based on unreliable and minor sources. But if you want to bring it back for a few days while that gets sorted out, WP:DRV. Phil Sandifer 13:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

DNF

Sorry about the edit summary. What i meant to say afterwards is that I put the images back on there, because I do agree that they show the evolution. Hbdragon88 22:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

List of syndicated broadcasters of Futurama nominated for deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of syndicated broadcasters of Futurama, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of syndicated broadcasters of Futurama. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Slowking Man 10:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

What did I ever do to you kid?

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. L0b0t 03:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your note

Hi... you were close, but you want to click the "discussion" link and edit that, rather than someone's user page. Also you should leave the note at the bottom and not wipe out the rest of the content. No (permanent) harm done though. What's up? —Chowbok ☠ 23:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Why did you revert a bunch of my edits?—Chowbok ☠ 15:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove text from someone else's user page or talk page. It is considered vandalism. --soum (0_o) 05:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing in Talk:Cow tipping

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:Cow tipping, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. soum (0_o) 05:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Last chance to stop vandalising in Soda fountain

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Soda fountain, you will be blocked from editing. soum (0_o) 05:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. soum (0_o) 05:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)