Supcom
Welcome!
Hello, Supcom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 13:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to BBC, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 13:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Your edits are definitely not non-partisian. At least three editors felt they violated wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Also, you have broken the three revert rule and could be blocked from editing very easily. Please discuss your changes on Talk:BBC and provide reliable references supporting your edits. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
We are a long way from arbitration. First, please discuss your changes on the talk page. Then, we can pursue Wikipedia:Dispute resolution if you wish. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Flag of Dorset
edit'Corporate Vanity' seems to be your buzzword and you're applying it to Flag of Dorset. The page is in no way corporate vanity as it gives the facts surrounding the Dorset flag. Now, it has been confirmed that the Dorset Cross IS a contender, this in a PR release by the editor of Dorset Life Magazine - the others are not confirmed, only by word of mouth. The Dorset Life editor was one of the panelists who selected it. So, how is it corporate vanity to put this on the page? Also, why did you move the discussion page?
A flag of Dorset exists in unofficial capacities already - the DCC armorial banner is one and the Dorset Cross being another - both are available to the public, hence existing as flags of Dorset, so the title of the article is correct and is not corporate vanity. The page was OK'd by other editors as not POV, so I suggest you make discussions first before moving the page or cutting huge sections out. White43 (talk) 12:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)