SuperNepoznat

May 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Serbo-Croatian. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperNepoznat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had only good faith, but those two were keeping reverting my edits for no reason. They were deleting my referenced content. And they had no arguments over that. SuperNepoznat (talk) 21:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

With edit summaries like this, I think the issues with you go far beyond the substance of the edits. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.