SuperNerd625

Blocked as a sock puppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 19:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperNerd625 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The blocking administrator concluded that I'm a sockpuppet of User:Mathemagician57721 solely on the basis that, like him, I only edited articles about Pokémon manga. However, if you look at the contributions of Mathemagician57721, you'll see that he made virtually no edits outside of his dispute with User:TheFarix. I, on the other hand, only made the edit that TheFarix reverted once, and then didn't try to reinstate my edit per WP:BOLD. In addition, other than the edits to Pokémon: The Electric Tale of Pikachu, I have made many edits which are indisputably constructive. Therefore, although I have edited articles mainly on the same general topic as Mathemagician57721, I have made constructive edits rather than edit warring like Mathemagician57721.

Decline reason:

1. When there's an edit war going on, one side is blocked, and a new user takes the place of the blocked user, then the new user is probably a sockpuppet of the blocked user.
2. When looking at your edits, and those of Kalium-39, it appears that these 2 accounts are operated by the same person. Regardless of whether or not Kalium-39 is Mathemagician57721, this is reason enough to block you.

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathemagician57721 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hidenori Kusaka

A tag has been placed on Hidenori Kusaka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello SuperNerd625! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mato (illustrator) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mato (illustrator)

The article Mato (illustrator) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 03:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mato (illustrator) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mato (illustrator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mato (illustrator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)