November 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Health Sciences Antigua, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DCEdwards1966 21:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University of Health Sciences Antigua, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. A8UDI 23:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to University of Health Sciences Antigua. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 talk 23:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to University of Health Sciences Antigua. fetchcomms☛ 23:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
UHSA
editPlease list a source for your claims so that they can be verified. Thank you.-- fetchcomms☛ 00:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jeepday (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Superfix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The licensing claims can be verified on either the Faimer or WHO website. THERE IS NO TRUTH IN THESE CLAIMS. THEY ARE AT BEST DISGRUNTLED MEDICAL STUDENTS WHO DO NOT HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO GET RESIDENCY LIKE US. As well, as an editor of this WIKI you must have a liitle more intelligence in your sources. If you are indeed backing up your completely untrue edits, you are either too lazy to do your research or a 'some poor sap that couldn't get residency'. If latter, do not be bitter, you are better of an internet webpage editor than a doctor. If not, then please go to www.faimer.com and www.who.org and NSLSC.org for federal loan information. If you do not do this, I will refer up to an administrator.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. (X! · talk) · @069 · 00:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Leuko Talk/Contribs 03:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)