Superwiki999

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bui Quoc Huy (May 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Many of the sources do not mention the subject and fail verification. In addition, the history of the subject is riddled with sock puppetry and promotion. Reviewers or others, look at the logs not to mention it is salted in mainspace.

S0091 (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Superwiki999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bui Quoc Huy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bui Quoc Huy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Smagzine per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smagzine. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)