User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2010/March

Drork

You are one of the people who turn Wikipedia into theater of absurd. You will be happy to know that I am no longer going to disturb your virtual war for the liberation of the Golan from the Zionists. Good luck. Within a few month the who land will be in Syrian hands, as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Will Syrians benefit from it? Probably not. Will Israelis? hardly. Will anyone else no. Actually most will be damaged, because they will be deprived of the truth. And yet you could get the highest Syrian award for liberating the Golan. Well... On Wikipedia. DrorK (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Your request

I'm sorry SD, I'm really busy with other things right now (in both real and wiki life), and I won't be able to get involved on that page at present. If you can't find anyone over the nest few days, and time is on my side, I'll try to swing by and do what I can. Again, my apologies for not being able to be of more help, but there's really a lot of stuff going on right now that I need to attend to. Thanks for understanding and good luck. Tiamut^talk 21:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Asmahan

Hello and thanks for your note. I'm afraid I'm too busy at this time to start getting involved in another (potentially) contentious article. Good luck. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

The article has nothing to do with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It is about an alleged art scam in other parts of the world. Please refrain from false allegations. They may backfire.--Gilabrand (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Article name changes

There was not consensus on the name change of the Mount Yosifon article. Other sources were presented, even though you do said here, that you do not consider sources written by Jews and Israelis to be reliable. An RfC needs to be opened, like I suggested here, when you first wanted to change the article name. This is standard procedure on all article name changes that might be controversial. --nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 20:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Consensus is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Il reply more to this at the talkpage. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

You do not determine the merits of the arguments. RfC will open up the issue to someone with the authority to do so. If you continue making unilateral, controversial edits of this nature as you have done time and time again, the matter will have to be brought to the attention of admins. Breein1007 (talk) 21:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia must use WP:RS. Source by "Israeli" or Jew can not be consider un bias source for article. It be like using article by child molester for article on child molesting. Conflict of interest prevent it from be reliable source. Ani medjool (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Reliable Israeli sources can be used. What your really mean is that the page should provide balance, presenting all views in an impartial way. This is called on wikipedia: Neutral point of view. Chesdovi (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Source from "Israeli" or Jewish author naturally not be impartial on Golan, since "Israel" claim it own Golan. Ani medjool (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

hi

I open discuss here that be relate to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#http:.2F.2Fwww.jewishvirtuallibrary.org.2F —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ani medjool (talk • contribs) 00:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Tell Abu nada

You're right, this article from Arabic wikipedia mentions it without Al. Yazan (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

The thing is

I did take a look at the prosed changes and I think they need more work before being instituted. I'm not up for the time involved in that right now (reading all the sources, proposing alternate formulations, etc.) I'm sorry SD, its just that these articles and the battles around identity surrounding them don't interest me much at all. Please forgive me. Tiamut^talk 20:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Your request on my talk page

Hi, thank you for trusting me as someone independent to look at that article. Unfortunately, I've got myself embroiled with a couple of time-consuming threads, (one dealing with the lovely meatpuppets at the JIDF, the other with the fringe theorists who want the idea that Shakespeare did not write his own plays to be given equal time with the more conventional point of view,) and have therefore run behind with a commitment to carry out a peer review for someone else. I asked Nishidani who ahs a mind able to cut through some things if he had time to provide some input. I hope that what he said was useful. If not, I might be able to look in next week.--Peter cohen (talk) 23:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I received an email from someone claiming to be you last night. You don't seem to have an email contact shown here. Could you please confirm that the email was from you and, if so, please feel free to continue with whatever it was about.--Peter cohen (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. This page have many article that expose truth. Might be use ful in edit of article on Golan Height. It also seem be source that can counter lies told by jewishvirtuallibrary.org. http://www.jewwatch.com/ Ani medjool (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

You think that is a reliable source? haha ok. Breein1007 (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Al ‘Al

Hi Supreme Deliciousness. Editors should probably discuss among themselves on the article's Talk page whether one village or the other is the main topic. I undid the page move because it was one of several POINTy page moves that Ani medjool made. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Asmahan amendment declined

Be aware that the request for amendment of the Asmahan arbitration case that was recently filed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment has been declined. For more information, see the last revision of the amendment request. If you have any questions, please contact myself or another arbitration clerk. Regards, AGK 12:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)