Surani alwis

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mahinda Pathegama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Falcon8765 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Reply: Many apologies if it appeared that way. It was only the only way known to me to improve the quality of the article. Any discussion I started in talk page seemed to get deleted and that was the reason why it happened that way. I will make sure that such acts will not occur in future.

Surani Alwis seems retaliating Mahinda pathegama by damaging his Wikipedia. Author of this page might know this page is created long ago and it was there smoothly without any damage, except once (in June 2009). I am sure that surani (this is not her real name) is an employee at the Sri Lanka Inventors commission. She got punished by the commission for her office matter. Mahinda pathegama is the commissioner. So she repeatedly attack mahinda Pathegama website by purpose. Otherwise why she really wants to change it right now? The question is how many other pages edited by her to improve it. If not what is the reason for that she repeatedly attack mahinda pategama's profile. Dear editor, please do not allow people to attack wikipedia pages like this. Thanks- Nisansala Bandara —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisalawila (talk • contribs) 01:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Surani pls stop retaliating Dr pathegama like this. Nothing may have happened to u by him. He is a respected person, an educated person in the country. He may not care what u do for him. So now please stop this game. You can attack his Wikipedia. But you can't change his contributions to the world. He is already a gifted Sri Lankan. You never can damage his image. it is obvious that this wikipedia has created by many people in other countries using data on the internet.. Not by pathegama or not by Srilankans. When you goto history page you can see it. I don't think you can do anything to his image by doing this.Even accidently I saw someone is attackting Mahinda sir's page, and I thought to recorrect it. Especially because he is a country lover.Ofcause he has done many to the country, before u know him. I am a student of him, He helped us a lot. - Nisansala —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisalawila (talk • contribs) 02:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Franceso pope

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Franceso pope. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pope Francis. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pope Francis – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ♥ Tentinator ♥ 19:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

AFD: Mahinda Pathegama

@Davey2010:

• Barnes and Noble, 2010, "Sri Lankan Scientists", General Books LLC, ISBN 9781157343691 : There is no book by this ISBN:

• Most of the references are from local news paper articles and has no "scientific" validity.

• Google scholar site for the : https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=mxuxRAcAAAAJ&hl=en has many articles not authored/co-authored by the person. And counts only 35+ citations, clearly indicating that it fails the notability criteria. You may consider the previous 3 deletions of the same article.

• There is no scientific articles cited in the wiki: listed below >

=Use of thermal imaging techniques in identifying target object characteristics =Remote system for microscopic cell analysis =Quantitative recognition of feature morphogenesis of SARS-CoV in diagnostic electron microscopy =Remote analysis of morphological features in diagnostic electron microscopy of SARS-CoV =Remote System for microscopic cell analysis =Biological cell interaction process due to electromagnetic radiation =Given the scale of population demographic shift, what are the practicalities of applying knowledge in a meaningful way for an ageing population? =Automated Sports-Talents Identification System and the establishment of National Sports Surveillance

• this citation ( Division of IT, engineering and the environment, BEng Electrical & Mechatronics Engineering Graduates, University of South Australia, [16] Retrieved 22.04.2001) just links the university website.

• This citation (University of Moratuwa, Alumni, [17] Retrieved 19.12.2001) just links the university website.
• duplicate citations: 1,22,36,92: 9,60: 21,84:
• many of the citations has no links to back up, just text.
• The breakthrough said to have been made by the wiki "Frequency-forced Digital Processing" is nowhere to be found online or in scientific articles. Clearly a topic without scientific basis.
• Citation "Creating Future Scientists Program, 'Profile of Scientist Mahinda Pathegama', 2015. [40] Retrieved 28.02.2015" refers to his own website. COI
• CItation "http://www.yatedo.fr/p/Mahinda+pathegama/famous/6ca706f6a16ccaa786ca3e202b366fdf" is an article appeared everywhere online shows some similarity to the wiki indicating some COI.
• The official website has nothing scientific but reiterating and re-directing to NASA website to which the person in wiki has no connection to.

Surani Alwis (talk) 20:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for the email but you could've just left a message on my talkpage :),

You hadn't actually nominated the article - You just added the "This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy." template which is useless,

If you want to nominate articles you need to carefully read WP:AFDHOWTO, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)