Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The
Adventure
Hi Susangrigg1!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. I've reverted your blanking of the article since the article was well-written and well-sourced. If you believe that it should be deleted, please nominate it for deletion under WP:CSD, WP:PROD, or WP:AFD. If you have any questions or comments, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. KJ «Click Here»22:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorin Morgan-Richards (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ArcAngel (talk) ) 17:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Connelly (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mike Textbeak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, Susangrigg1. I think you've confused one thing about Garfield's ancestors. The ones from Chester wasn't Chester in England, it was a place in Wales called Chester (perhaps a small village.) Although he was mostly English descent (although I have never heard of any English person today with the name Garfield, only ones whose Jewish ancestors changed it when they came here, as is the case with the guy from Amazing Spiderman) he did have a significant amount of Welsh ancestry, which could have been where he got his "Red Irish" look his mother talked of. In fact Garfield had more Welsh blood in him than any other US president, other than perhaps John Adams. As I'm relatively new to Wikipedia I can't site or make references to things on pages yet. I would recommend you have a good look on the internet for the Welsh blood of Garfield, which many reliable sites will confirm. I am not going to bother with editing the page again to include Garfield as one of the seven at least presidents or his picture in the box, because Im sure you'll just edit it back to not having him there and having Harold Lloyd there instead (someone whose Welsh ancestry really can't be proven). I understand that given "you don't have proof" you wouldn't want it on the page, what I don't understand is why you can't find any reliable sources to back this up? Especially when anybody else could.
I have just searched and immediately discovered a confirmation of this ancestry: go to the James A. Garfield page on Nations Wiki, section Early life reads "Garfield was born of Welsh ancestry". So please have a look at it and the reliable sources on Nations Wiki that are given and then tell me he wasn't Welsh. Let's do another one - Welsh Genealogy By Bruce Durie on Google Books, "Presidents with Welsh ancestry include Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, James Garfield, Calvin Coolidge, Richard Nixon and Barack Obama, not to mention Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Vice President Hubert Humphrey." And one more, the rest you can find on your own - The works of James Abram Garfield. (2 Volumes) Volume 1 By Garfield, James A. on Google Books, "From the meagre materials at our command, it appears that he was of Welsh descent on his father's side; though his ancestors resided for some time in England before they crossed the sea."--Emperorofthedaleks (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well Susangrigg1 for one I am not upset, I just don't think it makes sense that an American President with Welsh ancestry shouldn't be included on page about Welsh Americans? Yeah fair enough about Harold Lloyd, but he wasn't President of the United States. I too have been to North Wales many times, although I am not sure of where his ancestors came from in Wales, the websites I've mentioned back it up that he was of Welsh descent. But anyway how can there be hard feelings? It's only editing a page.--Emperorofthedaleks (talk) 17:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well Susangrigg1 as you can see from the conversation on my talk page, me and User:Middayexpress have already discussed making a collage image for the page, I'd be very grateful for your input, thank you. I based the people in the image on the ones in the Scottish American page, but there are a lot more famous Scottish Americans (or people who claim to be Scottish American) in the United States than famous Welsh Americans. The images for some of these don't exist, but we have well enough to use in the collage. On my page you can see which files I recommended to Middayexpress, now I think he may have started to make the image, including Garfield (but trust me he was a Welsh American, if I didn't know of reliable sources to confirm this there's no way I'd let him be on that page.) I don't mind Harold Lloyd being in the collage as he was of Welsh descent and notable. I've made sure we have some modern Welsh Americans, Patricia Arquette, Juliet Lewis, and Thomas Dekker (actor). One who I believe should be in the image is Robert Vaughn (Montana), the Scottish Americans have John Muir in his place (though he's not featured in there collage image.) I appreciate your care for the article, thank you. Best regards--Emperorofthedaleks (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
You reverted the deletion I made on the bio page of Lorin Morgan-Richards but the defects in citation have not been corrected and the factual statements I deleted still have no supporting citations. Can you tell me on what basis you have reverted the deletion? I have posted this same statement on the talk page and discussion should continue there.
Thank you very much,
gaabib 03:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaabib (talk • contribs)
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manny Stul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manny Stul until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby Ray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Watt (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreigner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Susangrigg1, i have just added a notability tag to List of Shopkins episodes as the article doesn't appear to meet WP:NLIST. Do you have any references that show an article is warranted. thanks.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gothic fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vampira. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Underground Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Connelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lorin Morgan-Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh Presbyterian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Susangrigg1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dalila Bela, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Once Upon a Time and Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joey Rocketshoes Dillon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Thornbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saddler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Huff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Before adding terms like "Bratnik" to the Gen Z page please add your sources that actually say this first. The cartoon reference you added said nothing about Generation Z. Thank you.198.245.188.67 (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Bratniks by Lorin Morgan-Richards.jpg
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Bratniks by Lorin Morgan-Richards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --DynaGirl (talk) 19:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Susangrigg1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Susangrigg1: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 09:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girther movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Fails to meet to basic listed in WP:BKCRIT. Trivial citations. Plenty of Google results, but only to blogs and bookshops. No in-depth coverage by independent sources. Looks a lovely book, but we need more than that for a Wikipedia article.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Susangrigg1. I noticed that you used celebritynetworth.com as a source for information in a biography article, Manny Stul. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that celebritynetworth.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello,
I wanted to let you know that I deleted the image you uploaded to . The image was claimed on Flickr to be released under a free license, but I found the image at [1] and it's likely that the license information on Flickr is incorrect. If I'm wrong (and it's entirely possible I am), please provide further documentation of the image's license information, and I would be happy to revert the deletion of this image. Thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia! —BorgHunter (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Susangrigg1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bonnie Vent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channeling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Susangrigg1,
Thanks for creating Marvin Townsend! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thanks for your new article on Marvin Townsend. I recommend some more sources that discuss his work in a professional fashion, and if those exist they could be mined for more content.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. I have reverted your edit to Welles Crowther, because it was not accompanied by a citation of a reliable source. As I'm sure you must know, having edited here since 2014, Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation. If you want to restore that material, please do so only if it's accompanied by the proper citation. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
I'll correct, thanks! --Susangrigg1 (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
A page you started (Jesse Krimes) has been reviewed!
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If you can get me some third-party evidence of notability from a reliable source - for instance, reviews that aren't from Amazon or Goodreads or Some Random Person's Blog, or coverage that's not in a crowdsourced database - I'll be fine with putting the draft back in mainspace. Until then, it's a draft. DS (talk) 18:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard-Lael Lillard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi! I was wondering if you had some more sources for the Western lifestyle article? I noticed you made a lot of contributions to it, and a lot of entries are un-cited right now. I'm currently trying to rewrite portions of it. Thanks, Darth Coracle (talk) 22:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --DynaGirl (talk) 19:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
,_2nd_president_of_the_United_States,_by_Asher_B._Durand_(1767-1845)-crop.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
. The image was claimed on Flickr to be released under a free license, but I found the image at [1] and it's likely that the license information on Flickr is incorrect. If I'm wrong (and it's entirely possible I am), please provide further documentation of the image's license information, and I would be happy to revert the deletion of this image. Thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia! —BorgHunter (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)