Sveinkros

Welcome!

Hello, Sveinkros, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rune Øygard, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Valenciano (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rune Øygard

The article Rune Øygard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mayor of a town of 3,500 people does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, concerns also over WP:BLP and WP:ONEEVENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Valenciano (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Rune Øygard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rune Øygard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rune Øygard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Valenciano (talk) 07:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norges Bygdeungdomslag

The deletion of an article you created, Norges Bygdeungdomslag, has been proposed for the following reason:

Appears to be non-notable - can you provide any more sources?

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Mdann52 (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norges Bygdeungdomslag

The article Norges Bygdeungdomslag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rune Øygard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NOK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jonna Støme

Hello, Sveinkros,

Thank you for creating Jonna Støme.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Do not remove this tag without addressing the concern.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

––FormalDude (talk) 10:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

May 2024

Please see Talk:Durek Verrett. SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to Harald V

…while unobtrusive, was a flagrant violation of BLP and perhaps also NPOV. I have manually reverted it. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 06:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to Durek Verrett

Hi, you suggested I take a look at WP:LEAD. Thankfully, I am already familiar with it, which is why I originally decided to remove the sensational tidbits that you inserted into the article's lead section. Usually, things included in the lead section should cite reliable sources and include facts that are important to the topic. You cite a Norwegian tabloid and Tatler, for instance, on Verrett's ridiculous claim of foreknowledge of 9/11. In fact, you cite several tabloids in the lead section for a variety of these facts. At the end of the day, Verrett is a convicted criminal with very bizarre beliefs; that much is true. However, Wikipedia's emphasis on a neutral point of view, especially in the lead section, still apply. The lead section should include general biographical facts, including the fact that he's a criminal, not royal, holds widely ridiculed beliefs, etc. But in its current form, the section is obviously formatted to make the article's subject look as silly as possible. Let readers form their own view by reading through the article, and not simply making the case for why he's terrible in the lead section. Theodore Christopher (talk) 20:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

This belongs on the article's talk page (without mentioning any users). I suggest we have it in a new section there entitled Lead material. I would like to discuss it, but not here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, you can open a discussion on the talk page about what to include in the lead. I did not revert your edit in its entirety, but I think you removed too much. For example, his book should clearly be mentioned in the lead. I also believe some of his most widely reported beliefs belong there; this is really what he is known for, apart from his marriage. He promotes his beliefs about vaginas and spirits in his book and in cooperation with Gwyneth Paltrow's business enterprises (that are equally focused on certain female body parts). This is really what he sells. --Sveinkros (talk) 12:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)