October 2022

edit
 – Sharing the discussion with fellow editors.

  Hello! I'm Aeengath. Your recent edit(s) to the page Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aeengath (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Aeengath! It is obvious that the article Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I) is based almost exclusively on Serbian sources, which is contrary to the Wikipedia's rule, that articles should be neutral and unbiased. Therefore, a Bulgarian point of view is also needed. The source which I added is an official document, prepared by the Bulgarian delegation as a response to the Serbian accusations. There is already a report of the Inter-Allied Commission as a source in this article, which contains accusations against Bulgaria. The Bulgarian document which is a refutation of Serbian accusations, is of the same type, and can be considered as the reliable source, like the report of the Inter-Allied Commission. Svev100 (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Svev100, Please discuss this on the article talk page, the content you added was not backed by the ref you provided that’s the reason why it was removed. Please read WP:CITE and WP:RS on how to source your edits. thank you. Aeengath (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Aeengath, yes, I mistakenly gave a link to another source. Now I corrected and gave a link to the correct source in my last edition. Thank you Svev100 (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I moved the discussion to the article TP please reply there thank you. Aeengath (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply